Simon L said:Can you hear the dump valve noise through the standard filter? Its not that big a deal, but everyone likes to hear it.
BMcN said:How the hell can you justify saying that mate. I just showed you a video of me doing it in the wet in 18sec on the speedo reading. So you are honestly saying that it will be 4 seconds out?
Open you eyes mate - no one is saying that the Cupra is the best car in the world, but I seriously doubt it'll get killed by a VTS between 80-120.
Almost every comment you make is based on your own feelings and projections mainly, I feel, to provoke an argument. Which, by the way, you seem to be very good at.
So please, why are you even here?
Madmile said:I would think stnd 18-20secs and around 14.5secs for a chipped one. I think shockxe did 13.8 secs qtr mile proven at brunters or some other pvw day with k03s.
i can my Lcr chipped does 0-100 15.2 secsNeil82 said:I'm sorry mad but I really can't see a re-mapped Ibiza Cupra doing 0-100 in 14.5!
Madmile said:LOL i could say the same about a clio cup doing 14.1@ 98mph.
Neil82 said:Thats proven though, think that was the run when I beat a classic shape WRX Impreza.
Agreed, thats why my 0-98 in 14.1 times on the 1/4 mile is way more accurate than watching the speedo on a video.RALF said:http://www.letstorquebhp.com/ lots of times for various cars.
IMO the only way to time a car is to stick some timing gear on it or get it down the quarter mile etc.
A speedo and wristwatch arent exactly acurate are they
RALF said:http://www.letstorquebhp.com/ lots of times for various cars.
IMO the only way to time a car is to stick some timing gear on it or get it down the quarter mile etc.
A speedo and wristwatch arent exactly acurate are they
Neil82 said:Because my car is easily faster than a chipped Cupra.
Neil82 said:It may make it about as quick as a standard Cup (in a straight line, handling you would crash trying to keep pace) but would no way "have" my Cup.
Madmile said:And my cars easily faster than your car. And its only getting better.
BMcN said:Looking at the site Neil a VTS should be considrebly slower than that one in the video - no way that was almost standard!