5ps or 2 bhp doesn't give a 0.5s difference in 0-60 times....maybe a 1 or 2 mph increase in top speed.
5ps or 2 bhp doesn't give a 0.5s difference in 0-60 times....maybe a 1 or 2 mph increase in top speed.
Well having drove both, i did feel the polo shifted a little quicker so maybe its got a different TCU Map to the Ibiza, that might explain how they managed to get slightly better fuel consumption and push it into the lower Tax band.
Inside is nice but I don't think i could live with those seats.
Comments regarding the quicker 0-60 etc. The ibiza is probably the same as all MY11 have the battery in the boot similar to the GTI. So one could assume all the engine tweaks made have also been done, thus making it the same performance.
VW probably have a contract somewhere with Seat saying they cant update the Cupra specs. Who knows!
So do all MY2011 Cupra's have the battery in the boot?
Interesting point you make about the battery position. We went and looked at a 10plate Boca and the battery was in the engine bay. My TDi has the battery in the boot which robs the boot of some depth.
So do all MY2011 Cupra's have the battery in the boot?
What's wrong with the seats in the GTi? In pictures they look well bolstered.
On the performance debate, I think I'd go for the marketing swerve. I mean the Polo is more expensive with less kit, I guess they need to make it look better at something to justify the price. IMO the Cupra looks better too, I just prefer the body styling of the SC with the flared rear haunches.
Nothing wrong with the Polo seats, I just don't like the pattern on them![]()
There is no difference between the Cupra and the Polo GTI in terms of performance. I agree with the previous posts about marketing being the driving force behind the differences.
I personally went for the Polo GTI over the Cupra based on the better interior and how it looks.
Nothing wrong with how the Polo looks
![]()
looks like a toy car John![]()
Polo looks quite nice
![]()
but I'd always pick a Boca! <3