oi_nutter2000 said:
That's just plain daft. I know of several people who have had 180s superchipped, with no such statements. I've got some pretty good contacts who work for a company called lorven performance who are also a superchips distributer. I've spent a lot of time there with various different cars over the years and know the guys quite well. I'm told by them that superchips has moved away from physical chipping along with the rest of the industry, and i've not known them to do anything but serial port jobs for the last few years.
Basically I'm a bit sick of ignorant people slating everything apart from revo, jabba and apr (and surprise surprise this site is heavily affiliated with all of those companies). I think the principles of revos switching technology are very good, and i'm very keen to have my next xar jabba'd. I just don't see why i'm always seeing superchips portrayed as some Wile E Coyotee company (strap the acme rocket around the acme tree) that they clearly are not.
I don't know what you're getting in a state about.
Superchips cater for most models of cars, and they usually seem to try to be first to market with their products.
Other tuning companies, who specialise in a specific manufacturer, and who spend more time developing the code for a particular engine will get better results.
I've a friend who works at superchips hq, and he agrees with me on this...its inevitable...
Superchips cater to the mass market, and they get 95% of the performance that other tuners get, which is plenty for most people, and by them not worrying about the extra 5% or so, enables them to get products launched much more quickly.
My own experiences tally up to this.
Therefore, someone who has a genuine interest in their car (and by virtue of them being on a forum talking about it, they do), is probably better off going to a well known specialist, as they will appreciate the extra 5% or so, or the additional features, like the ability to turn it on and off
