It wont be cheap but I will reuse a lot of my current engine bits - not a 20V anymore, likely a 16V
A rev happy 16v with lots of power sounds even better... In fact that could be a more interesting prospect than a 20vt for the cordy
It wont be cheap but I will reuse a lot of my current engine bits - not a 20V anymore, likely a 16V
.................I worked out hp - get this, 1659-2083 hp.
So either I have something very wrong or combustion is VERY inefficient.
added:
http://ffden-2.phys.uaf.edu/102spri...tes/Zach's Web Project Folder/EICE - Main.htm
Thermal efficiency and mechanical efficeincy is about 20-34% it says - HOW CRAP IS THAT !
this gives hp of 331.8-416 to 564-708 (first at 20% and second at 34% efficiencies)
Not far off.....
just goes to show how much power we could get from making the engines more thermally efficient......
Longer stroke crank will up the cc bud.
you mean a bit like this, without the supercharger...
http://www.vankronenburg.nl/PHP/page.php?page=projects_uk&pid=3&b=VAG
Just out of interest does lowering compression allow you to run more boost and therefore hopefully achieve more power and raising compression give more power from exacly the same amount of boost etc assuming no other changes?