benifits of removing n249

terry_ibiza_tdi

Active Member
Aug 6, 2007
52
0
ramsgate kent
hi all ive read alot about ppl doin this but what are the benifits as im giving my car a good goin over a weekend was gona do this but if it dont do anything whats the point lol. pros and cons please thanks
 

8bit

Active Member
Feb 11, 2010
3,401
3
Aberdeen
None whatsoever.

OK, I did it and I noticed no benefit at all. The DV started making a strange "crack" noise when dumping tho, which didn't sound good. I undid the bypass again, DV sounds normal now. Car felt no better at all with the N249 bypassed. It's all a big myth as far as I'm concerned.
 
Last edited:

t0m

LCR 225
Apr 29, 2007
8,133
7
Kent
I wouldn't remove it as such unless you're going to fit a resistor in it's place - or it'll throw a throttle boost code IIRC..

I bypassed mine and it felt a lot smoother going on and coming off boost afterwards :)
 

seatcupramad23

kc4even23
Sep 7, 2009
3,239
3
birmingham
remove my and the bloody dv stop dumping randomly on part throttle , and also get reid off a lot weight and potential vac leaks , common cause of bad running due split vac hoses and everything becomes easier to access
 

traumapat

Leon Cupra IHI
Jul 24, 2005
5,925
4
sunny sussex
Only time mine does anything is 2mins after starting from cold, i can hear it opening the dv on part throttle as it should do... certainly has never been a problem otherwise.
Mines staying.
 

cupraslayer

I want more bhp
Feb 8, 2008
1,543
0
northampton
Why do they do the bypass then? I have mine still , but have toyed with the idea of losing it. Surely if its on there , its there for a reason .
 

Roohul

Active Member
Jun 22, 2010
179
0
Romford, Essex
I have bypassed the N249 (but still connected) and removed the vacuum reservoir and ran the DV straight off the intake manifold. The DV response is so much better, slightly louder too but you won't get any performance gain.

Plus all the rubbish is removed from the top of the engine and better access to the coil packs.
 

t0m

LCR 225
Apr 29, 2007
8,133
7
Kent
I have bypassed the N249 (but still connected) and removed the vacuum reservoir and ran the DV straight off the intake manifold. The DV response is so much better, slightly louder too but you won't get any performance gain.

Plus all the rubbish is removed from the top of the engine and better access to the coil packs.

That's exactly how I have mine and I've found the same findings as you.
 

6th.replicant

Active Member
May 29, 2008
698
9
London
Why do they do the bypass then? I have mine still, but have toyed with the idea of losing it. Surely if it's on there, it's there for a reason.
^ Exactly.

But, hey, with millions of €s invested in R&D and legions of techies, what does VAG know? Much better to rip bits off your engine 'cos some blokes from a forum said it's a good idea :think:
 
Last edited:

Mo Arif

V.A.G Planet
May 5, 2010
2,510
0
Birmingham
Lol at some of the comments, removing the PCV is one of the best things you can do to a 1.8T proven time and time again, the fault codes can be eliminated by a simple resistor and now with the advancements of Bosch Me7.5 tuning, can be mapped out.

1. Less leaks
2. Less crap to break down and replace
3. Less clutter
4. Easier to located possible future leaks
5. Better DV response
6. Better throttle response

Man this forums changed a fair bit since I was last regularly active.
 

csd_19

Full Member
May 11, 2005
2,280
28
Angus / Edinburgh
The original reason (from a 6 year old thread on VWVortex) was purely to tidy up the engine bay, with a side effect of losing some weight (SAI weights 7-8lbs iirc)

That was all.

It came from a bunch of scene queens with mk4 Golfs who wanted to have a cleaner bay, do wiring tucks etc.

As stated many times on here and on various fora, there are no performance improvements from removing it, merely less clutter under the bonnet with less potential for leaks.

I bet if you replaced all the vac lines (seeing as the latest mk1 Leons will be 8 years old) and kept the n249 as intended you would fix undetected vac leaks and solve any running "issues"....
 

nd-photo.nl

Active Member
Mar 6, 2012
4,222
362
The Netherlands
youtube.com
Lol at some of the comments, removing the PCV is one of the best things you can do to a 1.8T proven time and time again, the fault codes can be eliminated by a simple resistor and now with the advancements of Bosch Me7.5 tuning, can be mapped out.

1. Less leaks
2. Less crap to break down and replace
3. Less clutter
4. Easier to located possible future leaks
5. Better DV response
6. Better throttle response

Man this forums changed a fair bit since I was last regularly active.

10/10 would agree again [B)]

PCV system is very prone for failure (boost leaks = power loss). Resistor will not always work, I had to disable mine via the tuner
 

cupraslayer

I want more bhp
Feb 8, 2008
1,543
0
northampton
Well I bit the bullet last night and had this done. A very very nice chap on this forum did it for me and took him 10 mins. Now my car hasn't been running the best for a while now, but boy did it make throttle response better. Dumps louder also.
Not saying everyone should go pulling bits out, but if its running crap , then give it a go. Saves replacing parts anyway.
 

Roach

Active Member
Sep 30, 2012
254
1
No Pcv delete removes the pipes from under the manifold.

249 bypass doesn't.
 
Last edited:
SEATCUPRA.NET Forum merchandise