A guy round my way quoted £100 all in on a 1.8t
I could have swore I saw a clip on
youtube of seafoam destroying an engine.
My mate told me when upgrading my 0.205um nozzles to 0.216um that it would take a 1000 miles or so to realise their full potential as the old carbon build ups would need displacing by the new spray pattern.
I would believe that the advantages of decarbonising the intake and exhausts. In the combustion chamber itself though is the place of carbon deposits on the cylinder wall at the top of the piston stroke. Also on the piston crown and the cylinder head around the injector/spark plug.
The advantages then would be a slight increase in volume at tdc. Also possible reduced shoulder wear or ring wear dependant on piston design from non carbon contact.
Better seating of the valves in the head. I would like to think that this process doesn't interfere with the lubrication process. It's hard to imagine that they would market this product if it had detrimental effects on the engine components.
What I'm trying to say is mechanical components don't allways behave the way you expect them to and disturbing an established environment/combustion chamber may not be a good idea. I used to operate a finnpower press and shear machine with punches and shear blades. It used to punch away at times and you'd think it's a good time to change a tool and although the profile hole was good the tool would be as rough as a bagger. Then You'd put a new tool in and it would jam two punches latter. Then change it for a tool that doesn't look any different and it would punch away.