does the jetex have a noticable performance increase then? because KnN state you will gain around 10bhp if the jetex gains the same results at a cheaper price then im sold. im not bothered how it looks. im interested in the sound and performance not the nice colour coded engine bay ill never see behind the wheel.
The K&N filter and the Jetex filter are practiacally identical in terms of construction, only difference is that the K&N filters need to be oiled and the Jetex dont from memory.
I have never been a fan of oiled filters, dry type is better.
Speak to Bill at Badger5 he can supply everything needed then get a heatsheild from jabbasport. Job done.
no point paying nearly £300 for this:
http://www.knfilters.com/typhoon/default.htm
when you can easily make something that performs the same for less money. Dont pay a huge amount of attention to the bhp claims from compaines as these will be tests done in near perfect conditions to get the absolute best result, even if its a one off.
From past experience fitting just air filters then getting cars rolling roaded I would say is more realistic to get around 5-8 hp, but depends on the conditions the setup and the individual car.
Main reason people fit these is for the underbonnet bling factor and the noise.
My LCR performs exactly the same with the stock box and panel filter compared to an open cone filter, only difference i can notice is the noise.


now that would be loud