WozzaB

Active Member
Jul 4, 2024
142
107
As per the title, my 67 plate 1.4tsi DSG is on about 65k.

The service history show a cambelt kit fitted at 46k along with spark plugs, brake fluid flush, and the usual oil and filter change.

Then oil and filter, coolant flush at 52k.

I've had the clutch and flywheel replaced, and the gearbox oil changed at 59k.

I've had rear shocks and springs, oil and filter done recently. Front shocks on the list as they've got light misting at the moment

Is there anything I need to be looking at 65k?
 
My 2018 Leon is only on 43,000 miles. The 2021 MOT mentioned light misting on a front shock. 2022 no mention. 2023 mentioned. 2024 & 2025 no mention.

My wife's 2010 Clio was owned for 12 years & every MOT from 2014 to 2022 mentioned light misting on one rear shock. Never caused a problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Pig
My 2018 Leon is only on 43,000 miles. The 2021 MOT mentioned light misting on a front shock. 2022 no mention. 2023 mentioned. 2024 & 2025 no mention.

My wife's 2010 Clio was owned for 12 years & every MOT from 2014 to 2022 mentioned light misting on one rear shock. Never caused a problem.
Neither Leon or Clio ever failed an MOT due to shock absorbers.
 
17 plate 1.4TSI 150 just about to hit 80k.

Serviced every 10k at Seat; cambelt done before we purchased at 30k in 2022. Brake fluid in 2023.
Last year did discs & pads all round as one of the rear pads had obliterated itself.
Earlier this year did rear springs as they were mentioned on previous MOT as rusting.
Last year it threw its fuel injector rail off so that needed replacing (interestingly this is a recall in the US but not over here). Otherwise, nothing else done. Running lovely at the moment (I've said it now lol).

Didn't think anything was required for the DSG?
 
My 2018 Leon is only on 43,000 miles. The 2021 MOT mentioned light misting on a front shock. 2022 no mention. 2023 mentioned. 2024 & 2025 no mention.

My wife's 2010 Clio was owned for 12 years & every MOT from 2014 to 2022 mentioned light misting on one rear shock. Never caused a problem.
The rear shocks were leaking pretty bad and one spring one was cracked! The fronts have light misting, but nothing urgent, but I'll get them done at some point though
 
@SamuelDonuts , yes it is a disgrace about these "incorrectly assembled Skoda built" EA211 engines needing to be fixed after failure, and paid for by the owner! As well as the potential for an under bonnet fire due to high pressure petrol being sprayed freely for a period of time, dictated by how long it takes to trigger the low fuel pressure engine management warning, and the driver to find a safe place to stop the engine and get out and away from the car!

Everyone should be aware of how little VW Group, especially in UK bothered about this, after I communicated with DVSA, they accepted that VW Group in UK had been in contact with them and had assured them that there was no known safety issue as the driver would get alerted to this failure (of a loosened bolt breaking) by a warning indicator on the dashboard, so should then, as for all other engine related issues, stop quickly! In other words, they admitted that this failure did not "set any flags" for their established protocol for triggering a recall. (not) Nice to know, my wife's August built Polo 1.2TSI might have been within the engine production window for this to be an issue, so I felt the need to contact DVSA on this topic, at least they replied, but I got the idea that if everyone that had experienced this, had contacted them, they would have re-visited their initial decision on this issue, so maybe "we" only have ourselves to blame in part. Did you contact DVSA about this? I'd think that most failed cars would have and still continue to, be getting handed into the nearest garage for repair due to cost and convenience, so VW Group, while being able to "see" the demand for what is a typical "repair kit of parts" are able to report not having handled many of these engines with this failure at our workshops, unfortunately the same goes for VW Group Indie workshops.

Edit:- for those who are not "in the know", this is not an early part failure or simple wear and tear, it is a bolt failure due to incorrect torque being applied at the engine assembly plant - ie a build issue covering a range of engine build dates which must be known to VW Group in Germany. As said, in some overseas markets, especially North America, the VW Group dealers requirement was to repair all failed engines FOC and to examine all held stock of car's engines covering a certain engine number range, and repair before sale/resale, using a defined kit of parts, again billing VW Group North America.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Mr Pig
17 plate 1.4TSI 150 just about to hit 80k.

Serviced every 10k at Seat; cambelt done before we purchased at 30k in 2022. Brake fluid in 2023.
Last year did discs & pads all round as one of the rear pads had obliterated itself.
Earlier this year did rear springs as they were mentioned on previous MOT as rusting.
Last year it threw its fuel injector rail off so that needed replacing (interestingly this is a recall in the US but not over here). Otherwise, nothing else done. Running lovely at the moment (I've said it now lol).

Didn't think anything was required for the DSG?
It sounds like I'm ok at the moment then.
The DSG gearbox oil was changed as part of the clutch and flywheel job, they did say they changed it as a 'while we're here' job and didn't charge for it.
 
As per the title, my 67 plate 1.4tsi DSG is on about 65k.

The service history show a cambelt kit fitted at 46k along with spark plugs, brake fluid flush, and the usual oil and filter change.

Then oil and filter, coolant flush at 52k.

I've had the clutch and flywheel replaced, and the gearbox oil changed at 59k.

I've had rear shocks and springs, oil and filter done recently. Front shocks on the list as they've got light misting at the moment

Is there anything I need to be looking at 65k?

@WozzaB - by ’brake fluid flush’ I’m assuming this is a brake fluid change. Brake fluid change intervals are every two years, so if the previous change was two years (or longer) ago, then it’s due another brake fluid change.
 
  • Like
Reactions: WozzaB
@WozzaB - by ’brake fluid flush’ I’m assuming this is a brake fluid change. Brake fluid change intervals are every two years, so if the previous change was two years (or longer) ago, then it’s due another brake fluid change.
It's down as 'Drain & Flush brake hydraulic system' with brake fluid in the parts list, so a different way of saying they've changed the brake fluid?

That was 09/2022 at 46k, so three years and 20k since it was last done, so I'll get that done, thanks for pointing it out ??
 
My 2018 Leon is only on 43,000 miles. The 2021 MOT mentioned light misting on a front shock. 2022 no mention. 2023 mentioned. 2024 & 2025 no mention.

My wife's 2010 Clio was owned for 12 years & every MOT from 2014 to 2022 mentioned light misting on one rear shock. Never caused a problem.
My car never failed an MOT on shocks either! - but the rears were both completely knackered at 110k miles!
Had several years of misting advisories.
You couldn't tell in the usual bounce test (wasn't like an old Citroen!) - but I knew the handling felt subtly strange, with a weird yaw/roll moment.
Both rear shocks had zero resistance when I changed them!


If they are 'misting' they are leaking oil!
The oil reservoir contained in your shocks is finite - meaning at some point there won't be enough oil for the shock to do it's job correctly.
Not to mention, shocks are also gas filled - to help with the ride quality/comfort, you can bet if the oil is misting - the gas has long since disappeared!
 
  • Like
Reactions: RUM4MO
@SamuelDonuts , yes it is a disgrace about these "incorrectly assembled Skoda built" EA211 engines needing to be fixed after failure, and paid for by the owner! As well as the potential for an under bonnet fire due to high pressure petrol being sprayed freely for a period of time, dictated by how long it takes to trigger the low fuel pressure engine management warning, and the driver to find a safe place to stop the engine and get out and away from the car!

Everyone should be aware of how little VW Group, especially in UK bothered about this, after I communicated with DVSA, they accepted that VW Group in UK had been in contact with them and had assured them that there was no known safety issue as the driver would get alerted to this failure (of a loosened bolt breaking) by a warning indicator on the dashboard, so should then, as for all other engine related issues, stop quickly! In other words, they admitted that this failure did not "set any flags" for their established protocol for triggering a recall. (not) Nice to know, my wife's August built Polo 1.2TSI might have been within the engine production window for this to be an issue, so I felt the need to contact DVSA on this topic, at least they replied, but I got the idea that if everyone that had experienced this, had contacted them, they would have re-visited their initial decision on this issue, so maybe "we" only have ourselves to blame in part. Did you contact DVSA about this? I'd think that most failed cars would have and still continue to, be getting handed into the nearest garage for repair due to cost and convenience, so VW Group, while being able to "see" the demand for what is a typical "repair kit of parts" are able to report not having handled many of these engines with this failure at our workshops, unfortunately the same goes for VW Group Indie workshops.

Edit:- for those who are not "in the know", this is not an early part failure or simple wear and tear, it is a bolt failure due to incorrect torque being applied at the engine assembly plant - ie a build issue covering a range of engine build dates which must be known to VW Group in Germany. As said, in some overseas markets, especially North America, the VW Group dealers requirement was to repair all failed engines FOC and to examine all held stock of car's engines covering a certain engine number range, and repair before sale/resale, using a defined kit of parts, again billing VW Group North America.
Do you happen to know the engine build dates this affected? Any way of finding out if mine is affected?
 
From memory, roughly mid 2015 until mid 2017.

There, unfortunately in UK market, is only one proper way, and that will be to remove the inlet manifold and check the torque of the bolts, if any are less than the specified torque, replace all the bolts.