1.6 16v or 1.9 TDi?

França

Active Member
Sep 4, 2009
59
0
Portugal
As i have already sayd i own a 1.9 tdi with 90 bhp with tha ALH engine the same engine and turbo that the 110 bhp but diferent ecu software so the car is cheaper and with a soft remap you convert the 90 bhp to 115 bhp give or take a few bhp
 

França

Active Member
Sep 4, 2009
59
0
Portugal
if its just the ecu thats different cud you not just put in the ecu from the 110 and remap that further?

thats not that easy because swaping the ecu´s whould force you to reconfigure the keys to the new ecu and some other electronic parts and thats not very cheap in a seat dealership.

so my opinion is if you want a everyday car but 90 bhp is a little short you buy the 90 bhp and than you remap it because it´s cheaper than replasing the ecu
 

França

Active Member
Sep 4, 2009
59
0
Portugal
but its just not the keys, it´s the keys it´s the (i don´t know the name in english lol) the confort module and i think the climatronic
 

chris285

leon mk1 fr tdi
Nov 26, 2004
1,849
0
lincoln, uk
best way to find out is to go out and test drive them and see if the diesel takes you over the petrol, as if cost is a problem then the diesel will cost more to buy but will cost less to run and tax and insure

the 90 and 110 tdi are different to the 130 and fr/cupra as the latter use PD technology i beleive which the lesser powered diesels do not. my car is very quick following a remap but not had it rolling roaded or down a strip, but i can still manage over 700miles on a tank if i drive correct for that

as for the noise discussion with a diesel my mate who had a v6 vectra commented my fr sounds nice for a diesel, this was before the exhaust was fitted as well.
 

hanman81

Guest
can anyone help my leon is a 20v red T cupra anyone know what the red T is about cant find anything on the net. also lookin for some euro style deep dish wheels anyone know sites to shop on
 

G223

Active Member
Dec 6, 2007
303
0
110 tdi all the way, lower maintanence costs than a petrol because it has 1/2 the service parts, and its significantly more reliable too, and plenty of grunt.
 

mikeholroyd

Guest
We have both a Leon 1.6 16V petrol, and a Skoda Octavia TDI (same engine as the Leon TDI).

Petrol 1.6 = problems with coil packs, sluggish, and thirsty (last tankful £54 for 300 miles) giving just on 30mpg. Also road tax at £185 per year.

Diesel 1.9 = super reliable, reasonably quick and much more economical (last tankful £53 for 495 miles). Road tax £120 per year.

Loving the Leon, but regretting not holding out for a diesel.

Turbos on the TDI? Yes, some have failed, but when your running costs are nearly twice as much in the petrol, even if you do have a failure at some point long in the future, you've still saved a fortune on your running cost.

Comparison? There is none. Diesel all the way!

Mike
 

Flameboydan

Full Member
Oct 23, 2005
226
0
Swindon + Nottingham
Bear in mind whilst reading that article the salary clarkson gets paid, and his lack of concern with any kind of economy. Yes if money was no issue, of course a petrol equivalent would outfire a diesel engine, but in the realistic world some of us need a compromise. I've got the pd130, and do a lot of motorway / dual carriageway miles, which it's prefect for - more than enough oomph to move me around (especially with planned remap!) plus hitting near 60mpg as an average.
My engine sounds pretty damn quiet to be honest, it's not clattery and you can barely hear it at all even at idle. You keep the engine well looked after and it'll stay like that. I personally love the purr of my engine when it's pushed a little :D
My old 1.9 ibiza did sound like a van (worse), but it wasn't in the best nick and was a pretty old engine with a hell of a lot of miles before I bought it.

It's all down to personal preference really, but real life does need to factor in somewhere. Opinions can't be taken seriously when someone implies something as sweeping as diesels all sound like vans and are therefore not worth looking at.

End of the day, the guy needs something to suite his needs, ie cheapish, perky and affordable, fun to drive. This in mind, I'd recommend the diesel. The 110 might be hard to find in your budget with low mileage, but then again if it's been well looked after I don't think 110k on the clock would put me off. There are less serviceable parts with the diesel, and a 1.6 petrol in my opinion would struggle to shift a car the size&weight of the leon. You'll get a good return on your mileage and have a better resale value when it comes to it. It'll cope better when it's full of passengers too so you can shift ur mates around campus happily :D
 

Alexis27

Active Member
Dec 20, 2009
2,206
540
Manchester
I think people are forgetting that petrol and diesel cars are not the same price.

Looking on Autotrader, 2.5k will get you a W reg 110 with 118,000 miles

or

a 52 1.6 with 65,000 miles.

Not only have you have to factor in twice the miles, but also an extra 3 or so years.