-
Hey Guest👍👎 We're looking for reviews of your local CUPRA or SEAT Dealership - it's quick and easy to do: Leave a review now
New Leon owner :)
- Thread starter SeanyK
- Start date
Did you not think about the 2.0tdi 140bhp? Easily mappable to the power of the FR?
350 miles to a tank seems a little low? I've travelled 370 miles so far this week and I'm showing 50 left in my Cupra, and with the hesitation issues I've been having, that ain't hanging about...
---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.634068,-3.519181
350 miles to a tank seems a little low? I've travelled 370 miles so far this week and I'm showing 50 left in my Cupra, and with the hesitation issues I've been having, that ain't hanging about...
---
I am here: http://maps.google.com/maps?ll=50.634068,-3.519181
ive got a 2008 leon cupra 2.0 TFSI and i avrange about 22 mpg 
and thats normal driving the highest ive ever seen it was 27.8mpg and that was 70 mph up the motorway lowest ive seen was 14.9
and thats normal driving the highest ive ever seen it was 27.8mpg and that was 70 mph up the motorway lowest ive seen was 14.9 
I think you will a manual transmission is more economical than an auto
In your quest for better fuel economy and more value, don't overlook the benefits of a manual transmission. In recent tests, we've found that a stick shift can improve gas mileage by a notable 2 to 5 mpg, compared with an automatic transmission.
Manual transmissions also improve acceleration, sometimes significantly. That can be a welcome benefit with a smaller engine. And many drivers find driving with a stick more engaging and fun, although that can depend on the car.
We bought several manual transmission equipped vehicles of different types and ran them through our fuel economy and acceleration tests. Then we compared them with similar automatic-equipped versions that we'd previously tested. (An exception: We compared the Mini Cooper manual with the automatic Clubman version, which is a bit longer and heavier, though it has the same engine.)
Of course, there are disadvantages to choosing a manual transmission:
Manual transmissions are available on only a relatively few models, which narrows your choices. They are typically found on small cars and sports cars.
Manuals require more skill and experience to operate well. For example, a car with a manual transmission is harder to get under way when stopped on an uphill (although some cars, such as the Mini and Subaru, come with a helpful hill-holder feature).
Congested traffic conditions require a lot of shifting and working the clutch pedal.
Because relatively few buyers are choosing manual transmissions, the car could be harder to sell later.
Bottom line
A manual transmission can deliver better fuel economy and acceleration. But there can be big differences in how the shifter and clutch feel and operate, so try before you buy. The manual Focus reduces noise by lowering engine revs. But the manual transmissions in the xD and the Forester had rubbery, vague-feeling shifters, which detracted from the driving experience. We also found that the Scion's awkward driving position is aggravated by having to operate a clutch pedal.
Remember, despite a manual transmission's advantage, you can sometimes do better by buying a different model altogether. For example, at 32 mpg overall, an automatic Toyota Corolla still beats a manual 29-mpg Focus.
In your quest for better fuel economy and more value, don't overlook the benefits of a manual transmission. In recent tests, we've found that a stick shift can improve gas mileage by a notable 2 to 5 mpg, compared with an automatic transmission.
Manual transmissions also improve acceleration, sometimes significantly. That can be a welcome benefit with a smaller engine. And many drivers find driving with a stick more engaging and fun, although that can depend on the car.
We bought several manual transmission equipped vehicles of different types and ran them through our fuel economy and acceleration tests. Then we compared them with similar automatic-equipped versions that we'd previously tested. (An exception: We compared the Mini Cooper manual with the automatic Clubman version, which is a bit longer and heavier, though it has the same engine.)
Of course, there are disadvantages to choosing a manual transmission:
Manual transmissions are available on only a relatively few models, which narrows your choices. They are typically found on small cars and sports cars.
Manuals require more skill and experience to operate well. For example, a car with a manual transmission is harder to get under way when stopped on an uphill (although some cars, such as the Mini and Subaru, come with a helpful hill-holder feature).
Congested traffic conditions require a lot of shifting and working the clutch pedal.
Because relatively few buyers are choosing manual transmissions, the car could be harder to sell later.
Bottom line
A manual transmission can deliver better fuel economy and acceleration. But there can be big differences in how the shifter and clutch feel and operate, so try before you buy. The manual Focus reduces noise by lowering engine revs. But the manual transmissions in the xD and the Forester had rubbery, vague-feeling shifters, which detracted from the driving experience. We also found that the Scion's awkward driving position is aggravated by having to operate a clutch pedal.
Remember, despite a manual transmission's advantage, you can sometimes do better by buying a different model altogether. For example, at 32 mpg overall, an automatic Toyota Corolla still beats a manual 29-mpg Focus.
stepea2202
Guest
I've since had a couple of cars since then (change like the wind!) But that was one of the worst cars I have ever driven for mpg.
So, a note to anyone out there, avoid the 2.0 FSI (not TFSI, just the FSI - Non Turbo) model, I was seeing at BEST 34mpg on a long trip! Other than that, lucky to see 30-31mpg.
Shame, as the car was good, that engine just wasn't (was quite quick though!)
I now have the CR170 and it's a different class entirely
So, a note to anyone out there, avoid the 2.0 FSI (not TFSI, just the FSI - Non Turbo) model, I was seeing at BEST 34mpg on a long trip! Other than that, lucky to see 30-31mpg.
Shame, as the car was good, that engine just wasn't (was quite quick though!)
I now have the CR170 and it's a different class entirely
the fr is a 2.0litre not a 1.9 and u should never buy your second choice car you will regret it every time you get in it, i know i did with previous cars
ive got a 2008 leon cupra 2.0 TFSI and i avrange about 22 mpg
Um please define your 'normal' driving coz 22 sounds quite bad! I get 22 when playing!. I average 31/32 going to work Which is about 8 miles of town and 2 of dual carriageway
I'm surprised the non turbo gives pretty much the same mpg
Last edited:
Similar threads
