Have superchips on my 1.8 TSI and had one on my mk2 cupra. A lot of people slate them but I have no complaints and driveabilty, power and torque increase is amazing. I had a dyno run on my Leon ST and bhp was around 247 with 360nm torque. That was before I fitted a milltek catback.
Revo vs Superchips vs Quantum Remap
- Thread starter chris_brown
- Start date
Have superchips on my 1.8 TSI and had one on my mk2 cupra. A lot of people slate them but I have no complaints and driveabilty, power and torque increase is amazing. I had a dyno run on my Leon ST and bhp was around 247 with 360nm torque. That was before I fitted a milltek catback.
I have had Most of the generic maps on various cars and tbh they all do what they say its the after service if things go wrong which separates the good from the bad .In the early days of mapping there was some right dodgy places but if you stick to the big ones you will have no bother Just had a Rocco R for three yaers with a Revo map on enging and DSG no probs .Now I have a new 290 and mapped it straight away after a couple of thousand miles put it on the rollers its putting out 370 no other mods and running on Tesco 99
I had the bluefin to do it myself at home. Both use the same map regardless if you go to HQ or order the bluefin, the end result is the same.
Exactly, I've had
"Custom Code/JBS" on Ibiza 1.4TDI
"Custom Code/JBS" on Leon FR TDI PD170... the numbers were fudged so ended up with Shark Performance in the end
APR on MK2 Leon Cupra R
Revo on MK3 Cupra 280, switched to APR eventually for higher power output
COBB on Porsche as APR don't do my engine
"Ecomax" on MK1 Leon PD150, bought the car with it, one of these man with a van types, file was terrible, now have a file from PDtuning.net
So all of them established companies apart from Ecomax and their "custom" file was absolutely terrible and not safe at all.
If I was going for a Custom Map I think I would use Jabba Sport and Generic would deffo be Revo
Similar threads
