What’s my next move here???
September 2005 I took my car in to the dealers to get the brakes checked. They’d gone soft at the top of the pedal – this getting progressively worse over time.
Dealer couldn’t find a problem, but bleeding them firmed them up to the point where they were the same as when I had the car 11k before.
Rang SEAT UK to register the work and leave a comment on their file that it had been remedied but may come back over a period of time.
Over the next 18 months it did very gradually came back, to the point of annoyance and then the other day whilst on the M6, I stood on the brakes and they went very “vague” and pulled me towards the central reservation!
Not good I thought and a similar thing happened a few days later at lower speed when I approached some red lights and the wheel spun to the right in my hand.
Rang SEAT UK and they said take it in to the dealers.
Took it in to a different dealer and the foreman tech guy said they did feel soft etc and to leave it with them.
Got the car back, brakes bled, firm pedal again.
SEAT UK rang for follow up call and said was everything OK and I said “yes” as in the brakes were firm again and “no” as this clearly underlined there was a cause to this that manifested itself in soft brakes over a period of 10k or so.
They said there was no problem reported by the dealer.
I said there must be a problem otherwise the bleeding of them twice, would not have alleviated symptoms.
They said there wasn’t a problem.
I said there must be otherwise bleeding them wouldn’t have made any difference.
They said there was not problem etc etc etc.
So I said ok, when it appears again outside the warranty period, will you put it in writing that you will treat the issue as pr-existing and cover me.
SEAT UK will look favourably but will not guarantee that any corrective work will be non-chargeable outside the warranty period etc etc.
For god’s sake!
The mere fact that not once but twice, having had them bled resulted in the symptoms going away temporarily, must show that there is an underlying cause to this and further investigation is required!
Again. Where can I go from here???
September 2005 I took my car in to the dealers to get the brakes checked. They’d gone soft at the top of the pedal – this getting progressively worse over time.
Dealer couldn’t find a problem, but bleeding them firmed them up to the point where they were the same as when I had the car 11k before.
Rang SEAT UK to register the work and leave a comment on their file that it had been remedied but may come back over a period of time.
Over the next 18 months it did very gradually came back, to the point of annoyance and then the other day whilst on the M6, I stood on the brakes and they went very “vague” and pulled me towards the central reservation!
Not good I thought and a similar thing happened a few days later at lower speed when I approached some red lights and the wheel spun to the right in my hand.
Rang SEAT UK and they said take it in to the dealers.
Took it in to a different dealer and the foreman tech guy said they did feel soft etc and to leave it with them.
Got the car back, brakes bled, firm pedal again.
SEAT UK rang for follow up call and said was everything OK and I said “yes” as in the brakes were firm again and “no” as this clearly underlined there was a cause to this that manifested itself in soft brakes over a period of 10k or so.
They said there was no problem reported by the dealer.
I said there must be a problem otherwise the bleeding of them twice, would not have alleviated symptoms.
They said there wasn’t a problem.
I said there must be otherwise bleeding them wouldn’t have made any difference.
They said there was not problem etc etc etc.
So I said ok, when it appears again outside the warranty period, will you put it in writing that you will treat the issue as pr-existing and cover me.
SEAT UK will look favourably but will not guarantee that any corrective work will be non-chargeable outside the warranty period etc etc.
For god’s sake!
The mere fact that not once but twice, having had them bled resulted in the symptoms going away temporarily, must show that there is an underlying cause to this and further investigation is required!
Again. Where can I go from here???