The small print in car manufacturer’s warranties is often their ‘get out of jail free’ card and can significantly limit the value of the warranty to the consumer and paintwork and corrosion warranties seem to be the worst for this. Additionally, there seems to be inconsistency of approach by the car manufacturer to warranty claims; as an example, in the mk5 Golf era VW fitted sponge support blocks between the inner and outer front wings at the 12 o’clock position above the wheel arch in some (all?) models of their cars. Being sponge, these blocks absorbed and retained water which over time caused the top of the wheel arch area of the wing to corrode from the inside out. VW‘s (inconsistent) three pronged approach to warranty claims was to;
- replace the front wings on some cars
- repair the affected area(s) on some others
- outright decline of the warranty claim on the remainder
I think with paintwork and bodywork warranty issues I’d rather have repairs carried out by a specialist body
shop than a dealership paint
shop. It might void the paintwork / corrosion warranties, but the standard of work is likely to be better than if done by the dealership paint
shop and as said, the warranty may be worth very little because of the small print or the dealers / car manufacturers opinion of warranty coverage.
Apologies to
@creixcka for going off topic. Hope you get your light bar replaced under warranty without issue

.