so hang on, we doing 3rd to 4th or just 4th?
why not just 50 - 100 in 4th so no human error can play a part in the gear change???
why not just 50 - 100 in 4th so no human error can play a part in the gear change???
seems very quick considering whats his name with the 260 bhp fabia vrs said about 5 seconds... ???
i'll try the 40 to 100 test later today.
Also Devon's car is bound to be a fair bit quicker than 5 seconds
Glynn
20 - 60 in 2nd/3rd = 6 seconds
40 - 100 in 4th = 11.5 seconds
40 - 100 in 3rd/4th = 10 seconds
50 - 100 in 4th = 9 seconds
once remapped it will good to see a direct comparison...
Surely the 40 to 100 cant be right at 10 seconds.
That would give you something along the line of 14.5 to 15 second 0 to 100 without using 2nd gear? thought your car was standard.?
Glynn
as far as i know its standard...
4th gear was 11.5, through the gears (3rd to 4th) was 10 seconds, maybe 10.5.
car does seem to pull much better since i used some millers.
The only car i have went up against was a BMW 320ci off the line, about half a car length in front to 55/60 then really pulled away from it in 3rd gear.
Have nothing else to compare it to.
maybe add a second on for speedo inaccuracy too, went to about 105 when i stopped the stopwatch.
will try and do a video of it.
maybe add a second on for speedo inaccuracy too, went to about 105 when i stopped the stopwatch.
will try and do a video of it.
Try this if you can get access to a runway!
40 to 100 in fourth
Timed mine genuinely at 10.5 seconds
Good or bad?
Glynn
Not trying to stir it up again but these figures quoted by sfalcus are Aston martin/ 911 gt3 figures, all from a 150bhp leon? Not even mapped should be any where close to whats quoted- sorry
Glynn
911 gt3? hahaha
a CTR does 0-100 in about 16 seconds, a 911 gt3 will do it in 10 or 11
I am saying in 4th i am well over a second slower than you are claiming.
I know for a fact that the car wont do 0-100 in 15 seconds, and also, a std 320ci 0-60 is 7.9, according to parkers anyway...