GREG_R84

Keep right on
Oct 3, 2007
656
0
Tamworth
To all forum members, please be aware of the following white leon cupra ( DU08 GCF ) which was purchased from Clarks of Kidderminster on 18/11/2010 for £12,995 and as of tuesday 31/5/2011 will be returned for good.

All of the following problems have been bought up with the dealer and have been logged with Seat UK. The car was purchased by my partner, who for some reason didnt test drive the car before purchasing it nor take anyone with her to check it out. All i can assume is the dealer seen her coming as it was also advertised with an ipod dock, which they later fitted due to us complaining and the advertised millage was out by 4k miles

So to start, as advertised all seat cars have a 102 point inspection prior to being sold to the public?

After arriving home and seeing the car on the drive i decided to give it the once over and found the following :-

* Engine cover/air box not secured and one of the rubber bungs was in the boot.

* Washer bottle nearly empty

*Screws holding on the air feed to the bumper were missing and was being held on by one wood screw.

*Front grill not secured

*Drivers front tyre at 19 psi all others were at 32 psi.

I inflated the tyre, fixed the grill and topped up the washer fluid and a few days later the car went back to the dealer which is a 100 mile round trip. They said there was nothing wrong with the engine cover, same for the deflating tyre and they had ordered the screws for the air feed.

The next day i took the car to a local garage and within 5 mins found a screw in the tyre which was casing a slow puncture, fixed at £12. After 3 weeks and no sign of the screws for the air feed i ordered them from central seat which took 3 days to arrive. I myself then drove over to the dealer with the invoices for the tyre repair and screws to get our money back, even though at under £15 thats still not the point. Though they were more interested in the vinyl wrapping on my car.

In December 2010 the car developed a squeak and for a second time did a 100 mile round trip to the dealer and back. Out come being that the alternator belt needed changing. A week later it went back to have this done, which they didnt do as id marked the belt with tip-ex prior. Also on return two of the alloys had been kerbed.

The car then failed its first MOT in march 2011 due to the front passenger tyre having a bulge. So two new front tyres which Clarks kindly picked up the bill for.

April 2011 the car developed a very loud/ bang rattle from the front drivers side, so as you can guess back it went. This time they changed the cam belt and broke the cam cover and fixed the rattle which was to do with the brake pipes. However it broke again on the way home so they took it back in. 4 days later the car returned only for me to find a broken cam cover and a snapped air feed. Back it went, they replaced the cam cover but instead of repalcing the air feed they replaced the engine cover????

Two weeks ago the brake rattle started again and we've had enough so its going back.

Just a few other points, the car has had 6 services since built but no paper work to show what has been done. Its been mapped, but by who we dont know. And i believe the previous owner had fitted an induction kit, which is why the air box didnt fit right and the air feed screws were missing from when he took it off to sell and give it a standard look
 
Last edited:
thanks for the heads up. personally feel threads like this should be made sticky as im sure there must be otheres on here from people who just feel you should stay clear of there car after trade.

what was this rattle like greg. is it like anything on the other thread ?

thanks

lee
 
thanks for the heads up. personally feel threads like this should be made sticky as im sure there must be otheres on here from people who just feel you should stay clear of there car after trade.

what was this rattle like greg. is it like anything on the other thread ?

thanks

lee

It was a loud rattle/ banging that could be heard over the radio
 
car sounds like a right lemon.

Personally i wouldnt of even entertained the fact of buying a car without test driving it first and in her case taking someone to have a look at it. She was just trying to be clever and it back fired
 
Oh and i forgot. The wheels have been sprayed black, and what a mess they look. Paint drips all over them. I dont have a pic but you cant miss it as it has side skirts, k1 spoiler and front n rear S badges painted camo, all done by previous owner
 
Last edited:
So you're getting all your money back?

She'll find out the out come tuesday/ wednesday. The car was on finance from seat. All this because i got a k1. And not to confuse anyone, the car on my profile is mine. Shes not a forum member
 
Last edited:
Sorry for asking so bluntly I'm not clued up on the nuances of a finance deal. Hopefully you'll get all the your money back and it will be lesson learnt for your partner! My fingers are crossed for you.
 
Sounds mild compared to robdf2 being honest. Still not good though.
 
am i the only one that thinks you might struggle to get it taken back.
If your partner was aware of the real mileage before buying then i cant see this being an issue.

The other points sound like they were mainly due to the previous owner. 100 point check or whatever is more to do witht he car being safe, - if each nut and bolt where to be checked it would be a 5000 point check.

You clearly feel let down, so perhaps the dealer will be helpful, however they do appear to have taken action to correct things. - even if they did not get it quite right.

you have had the car 6 months.. so i think you might be disapointed... Things do go wrong with cars.. 6 months to decide its not as expected?
If they do take it back id expect them to take into account 6 months depreciation (which they are entitled to do by law as you have use of the item) and depending on the deposit size you could actually owe more than the car is currently worth.
 
am i the only one that thinks you might struggle to get it taken back.
If your partner was aware of the real mileage before buying then i cant see this being an issue.

The other points sound like they were mainly due to the previous owner. 100 point check or whatever is more to do witht he car being safe, - if each nut and bolt where to be checked it would be a 5000 point check.

You clearly feel let down, so perhaps the dealer will be helpful, however they do appear to have taken action to correct things. - even if they did not get it quite right.

you have had the car 6 months.. so i think you might be disapointed... Things do go wrong with cars.. 6 months to decide its not as expected?
If they do take it back id expect them to take into account 6 months depreciation (which they are entitled to do by law as you have use of the item) and depending on the deposit size you could actually owe more than the car is currently worth.

All true...can only remain optimistic in my eyes, hence why fingers are crossed
 
Oh and i forgot. The wheels have been sprayed black, and what a mess they look. Paint drips all over them. I dont have a pic but you cant miss it as it has side skirts, k1 spoiler and front n rear S badges painted camo, all done by previous owner

Someone on here used to have that i'm sure of it.

I've saw the camo badges before
 
Clarks have said they will have the car back as the first issue with the car was made clear within the first 60 days of purchase. Shes just got to wait and see what she owes or if she'll get the deposit back
 
am i the only one that thinks you might struggle to get it taken back.
If your partner was aware of the real mileage before buying then i cant see this being an issue.

The other points sound like they were mainly due to the previous owner. 100 point check or whatever is more to do witht he car being safe, - if each nut and bolt where to be checked it would be a 5000 point check.

You clearly feel let down, so perhaps the dealer will be helpful, however they do appear to have taken action to correct things. - even if they did not get it quite right.

you have had the car 6 months.. so i think you might be disapointed... Things do go wrong with cars.. 6 months to decide its not as expected?
If they do take it back id expect them to take into account 6 months depreciation (which they are entitled to do by law as you have use of the item) and depending on the deposit size you could actually owe more than the car is currently worth.

Yes some of it is her fault. But the point im trying to make is the car was advertised with the wrong millage, an ipod dock and front head light washers. Ok there all thing that you wont really miis, but why advertise that the car has them when it doesnt?

They did have an ipod dock installed and agreed a free service due to no head light washer.

As for the 102 point check, i understand what you mean its just a safety check but as soon as you opened the bonnet you can see things are not right. Even a blind YTS lad could of picked up on that