I always ran my LCR on v-power because i felt it was better for the car and power. I wasn't interested in the mpg as i do about 50 miles a week. I once used the cheap stuff (as the good stuff was unavailable) and it gave me a fault code due to my sports cat. I recently had it mapped (stage 2) at stealth racing and not only did he map it on 95 ( it wan out of fuel when they had it "/ ) as he said it was best to map on 95 (obv not to get the best possible figures) but he also made it a de-cat map which meant i could now run it on cheap fuel with out the warning light coming on. Obviously i questioned the fact that 95 isn't brilliant but in his own words were.."If your just commuting then use 95, if you want to give it some beans use 98" he also said it would take 15 miles or so to adapt. Since this i have been using 95 ( Due to pressure from mrs..as i just spent 2 and a half grand on it and this saving in fuel seemed to be a little light for her ) however having read this thread i will put in some v-power and compare the mpg.. i'm currently getting 27mpg driving normal with the occasional joy ride. However if the theory is correct i can try justify the price difference to the mrs and weep the rewards of the extra horses too.. should be in the mid 290's then![]()
Probably should note that with the better acceleration id more than likely drive more like a boy racer destroying any benefits of improved mpg ha ha
Look at is this way with the price difference you only need to do 13.1miles more on vpower for it to work out the same miles per pound as 95ron (using my figures that is) so why bother I just don't see the point? (aimed not directly at you but to the whole thread)
Now can everyone stay on topic..........ummmmm topics
