What did you and your MK2 do today?

big eck

Active Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,976
2
Falkirk, Scotland
Running well there son. Very impressive numbers.

Can you post up your engine only mods so that folks can see what the differences are. I'll do mine as well lol.
 

WeeG

Active Member
Nov 5, 2008
3,407
4
Largs , Ayrshire
Running well there son. Very impressive numbers.

Can you post up your engine only mods so that folks can see what the differences are. I'll do mine as well lol.

No hassles dude

Revo intake
Eurojet intercooler
Full miltek 3" system
Autotech HPFP
Neuspeed turbo discharge pipe
Rs4 fuel pressure valve :)
APR V3.31 stage 2+ 98 octane
390.3bhp, 397.4 lbs ft torque
 
Last edited:

big eck

Active Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,976
2
Falkirk, Scotland
My mods when the run as done were as follows

Stage 2+ Revo software
RS4 valve
Autotech hpfp
Pro Alloy fmic
Evoms intake
3" turbo back miltek & 100cell sportcat
372.8bhp/337.8lbft
 

big eck

Active Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,976
2
Falkirk, Scotland
The only differences from mine are the software, revo intake (which I've now got) and the neuspeed turbo pipe. Kinda wish I kept the neuspeed pipe on mine now lol. Really curious if the revo intake adds anything extra to mine.
 

WeeG

Active Member
Nov 5, 2008
3,407
4
Largs , Ayrshire
The only differences from mine are the software, revo intake (which I've now got) and the neuspeed turbo pipe. Kinda wish I kept the neuspeed pipe on mine now lol. Really curious if the revo intake adds anything extra to mine.

Evoms and Revo are identical going by Graham lambs golf r and my LCR with same software. Both pull 310+ g/s
 

Aaz

May 21, 2011
513
0
Kent, England
Put the gloss black b pillars on and looked at changing the tail pipe or back box.

Any one got any pics of an FR with a different exhaust? Don't want to go down the expensive route, hence why i was just looking at changing tail pipe, for the aesthetics
 

WeeG

Active Member
Nov 5, 2008
3,407
4
Largs , Ayrshire
Your right Kev. Simon couldn't find my old comparsons so we used Big Eck's but he told me the correction factors should compensate for ambient differences. I'm not slagging revo I loved the code, it's only to compare with what I have now which isn't a 'race file'
 

Pimped up vario

Cordy Cruizer
Nov 20, 2009
1,291
0
Belfast N Ireland
I think I'd prefer the revo even though it's down on power on the apr from 4500 to 5750 rpm, it looks like a nicer more progressive power delivery. It would be better for traction and easier on components and more than likely a nicer feeling drive. That is unless you like a big shove at 4500 rpm then it stays a bit flat until the end of the power band.
 

WeeG

Active Member
Nov 5, 2008
3,407
4
Largs , Ayrshire
I think I'd prefer the revo even though it's down on power on the apr from 4500 to 5750 rpm, it looks like a nicer more progressive power delivery. It would be better for traction and easier on components and more than likely a nicer feeling drive. That is unless you like a big shove at 4500 rpm then it stays a bit flat until the end of the power band.

Flat to 390 bhp lol
 

shnazzle

Glass-Half-Full Member
Sep 9, 2011
3,480
6
Northumberland
I do wonder about the driveability of Revo vs APR as well. Does the APR feel aggressive? Perhaps too aggressive?
I don't really care whether it pulls 370 or 380...do care about daily driving comfort to a relative degree
 

big eck

Active Member
Aug 11, 2005
3,976
2
Falkirk, Scotland
I can't comment on Gs car as I've not had a go in it yet but mine is pretty nice to drive. Its quite a progressive power band in mine. I think Gs is deffo quicker on the move once higher up due to his torque tho. His was crossing the line on the 1/4 mile at just shy of 115mph where I was a tiny bit over 110.
 

WeeG

Active Member
Nov 5, 2008
3,407
4
Largs , Ayrshire
Haters gonna hate anyway.

Fact is
.Simon is a revo dealer
.correction factor was on
. Cars were rev matched
. My car is the highest ko4 reader he has had on pump fuel
 
Genuine SEAT Parts and Accessories.