Exactly! Will be a good marketing point from a tuners point of view, and also for those thinking of getting a remap they can see the REAL difference it makes and not just figures
 
But it would show what gains are made over standard in the metal......NOT just on paper.....

people who have had theirs mapped will already know this though :shrug:

Its not a understatement when people say it completely transforms the car. [B)]

stage 1 takes it from being quicker than a astra vxr to it being quicker than the new focus rs.
 
By the way, perhaps a bit random and off topic, but there is nothing between a Stage 2+ GIAC car and a Stage 2+ Revo car :)
 
people who have had theirs mapped will already know this though :shrug:

Its not a understatement when people say it completely transforms the car. [B)]

stage 1 takes it from being quicker than a astra vxr to it being quicker than the new focus rs.

So where's the harm in putting each car side by side for the dudes that haven't yet remapped??

Nice to see 300bhp + figures BUT is it usable? Does it make that much difference over stock?

Its ok to say ye it gives a good kick in the back but that means nothing, side by side is the only true account of performance gain.

So i say shoot off between stock and ALL mapped cars..........winner takes all????(or should that be tunner) ;)
 
Last edited:
So in the "real" world what will a Cupra with bluefin actually gain HP wise, but more importantly what will the performance gain be, ie 0- 60 time and or will it improve top end?

Thanks.

When I bought my Bluefin the only issue I had was the power delivery coming in a 4k rpm (which I then found out was normal). When talking to the chaps at superchips about this they said they had a cupra on the rollers a few days earlier and was registering around 310bhp (with a Bluefin remap).
 
When talking to the chaps at superchips about this they said they had a cupra on the rollers a few days earlier and was registering around 310bhp (with a Bluefin remap).


Which map was it running? Stage 1,2 or 3? And did they give you any hint of other mods it had?
 
When I bought my Bluefin the only issue I had was the power delivery coming in a 4k rpm (which I then found out was normal). When talking to the chaps at superchips about this they said they had a cupra on the rollers a few days earlier and was registering around 310bhp (with a Bluefin remap).

Dyno dependant of course :)
 
DJ's in his MK2 Cupra against Owen's MK2 Cupra. The other one of DJ's is against a Yellow MK1 Cupra

:yes:

Ammended original post. The Yellow MK1 Leon was actually a Leon Cupra R though belonging to a forum member on here :)

There is a fair difference between the MK1 LCR and MK2 LC performance wise.
 
when i initially made enquires about bluefin, superchips informed me they were getting good results with the mk2 cupra around the 300 mark
 
Superchips claim 294bhp with remap alone as seen here

With their "stage 2", this increases to 321bhp, although it does not detail which parts are required. Details here. One would assume an intake and exhaust, and possibly fuel pump.

With their "Stage 3", this increases to 337bhp as seen here, although again, it does not detail what parts are required. One would assume, intercooler, fuel pump, intake & exhaust.
 
what stage map was Owen running?

GIAC map only. His was one of the first to have it installed. Funnily though, on the day with regards to times and speeds, my car made 14.3 @ 101.2mph, and Owens made 14.2 @ 102.5 as memory serves.
 
GIAC map only. His was one of the first to have it installed. Funnily though, on the day with regards to times and speeds, my car made 14.3 @ 101.2mph, and Owens made 14.2 @ 102.5 as memory serves.

So that shows there is no real difference in a 1/4 mile,
 
So that shows there is no real difference in a 1/4 mile,

I would not say that to be fair. I had a few more runs on the day than Owen, therefore bettered my time as the day progressed. Owen took off after just a few runs. I have no doubt whatsoever that Owen would have been quicker with more runs.