1) Where are your facts behind this and what does it equate to in terms of performance and how do the disadvantages of 19's and extra weight eat in to that?
2) Explain out perform? Bear in mind every tuner claims the same figures for both cars mapped. Also bear in mind the Cupra has the tools to make that "same" performance work more effectively. And where are the lap time proofs of Cupra v Cupra R? On paper, yes a Cupra should be quicker A to B - I have never seen the proof other than straight line stuff which my own experience doesn't add up ( see my post above ).
3) Why not admit that you can't be bothered because you know can never admit defeat? Performance is not just down to a tiny % more power or torque as you know
4) What's self explanatory?
As for name calling, I actually didn't think you'd stoop that low sir.