Status
Not open for further replies.
So
post 1 i was talking about power output and WeeG was able to confirm

Post 2 I gave my opinion and i still think a mapped LCR would out perform a mapped LC due to better cooling

Post 3 as above

Post 4 self explanatory

hopefully now you can stop being a moron :lol:
 
1) Where are your facts behind this and what does it equate to in terms of performance and how do the disadvantages of 19's and extra weight eat in to that?

2) Explain out perform? Bear in mind every tuner claims the same figures for both cars mapped. Also bear in mind the Cupra has the tools to make that "same" performance work more effectively. And where are the lap time proofs of Cupra v Cupra R? On paper, yes a Cupra should be quicker A to B - I have never seen the proof other than straight line stuff which my own experience doesn't add up ( see my post above ).

3) Why not admit that you can't be bothered because you know can never admit defeat? Performance is not just down to a tiny % more power or torque as you know ;)

4) What's self explanatory?

As for name calling, I actually didn't think you'd stoop that low sir.
 
So
post 1 i was talking about power output and WeeG was able to confirm

Post 2 I gave my opinion and i still think a mapped LCR would out perform a mapped LC due to better cooling

Post 3 as above

Post 4 self explanatory

hopefully now you can stop being a moron :lol:

Just to quote the name calling for when it is edited ;)
 
1) Where are your facts behind this and what does it equate to in terms of performance and how do the disadvantages of 19's and extra weight eat in to that?

2) Explain out perform? Bear in mind every tuner claims the same figures for both cars mapped. Also bear in mind the Cupra has the tools to make that "same" performance work more effectively. And where are the lap time proofs of Cupra v Cupra R? On paper, yes a Cupra should be quicker A to B - I have never seen the proof other than straight line stuff which my own experience doesn't add up ( see my post above ).

3) Why not admit that you can't be bothered because you know can never admit defeat? Performance is not just down to a tiny % more power or torque as you know ;)

4) What's self explanatory?

As for name calling, I actually didn't think you'd stoop that low sir.

1) I told you already it was about power output and WeeG proved what i said

2)I believe it would, its my thoughts on 2 different cars

3) nothing to admit

4) the post

and since you don't seem to understand the concept of a joke (with added smiley to show) no point in me saying more
 
To engage any of my time in this thread would lead to me to wasting my time and I have so little of it to give.

:handbags:

Closed and scrapyard!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.