I had a map which was putting out about 225 then upgraded to revo which claims 260 but realistically 240ish.
are the differences not: +30bhp or +60bhp, FR seats, stiffer suspension, better alloys, FR front and rear bumpers and twin exhaust? FR is obviously a better package
I'm guessing about a 60bhp gain but TBH the Sport could be a bit of a sleeper...have you done anything else to the engine at all yet? I assume these cars also have a single intercooler?
Its yet to be proven from what I have seen that the Sport is putting out less than the FR in terms of power.
Something that has'nt been mentioned is the FR being MY2007 and onwards may have come with an AUX or Ipod input which the sport did not have.
after a wash saturday just gone
![]()
Hi Stu
I had a Sport for 2 years prior to my FR. Apart from what has already been mentioned i would say the ride is slightly softer, but the drive is just as good, perhaps feels marginally slower in standard form but only noticeable if you are really going for it...
I changed the suspension on my Sport after a couple of months due to the appalling ride quality, I can't imagine the FR was worse; did your Sport have 17" wheels and the FR 18"?
As already mentioned, everything I've ever read about the differences between the Sport and FR all say that other than the supposed 15bhp, it is all entirely cosmetic.
.
.