I used to get 230-240 miles with my fn2 rarely seen above 26mpg but i used it for what it was designed forWhen I had an ep3 I'd be lucky to get 300 miles to a tank but many smiles per miles
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
I used to get 230-240 miles with my fn2 rarely seen above 26mpg but i used it for what it was designed forWhen I had an ep3 I'd be lucky to get 300 miles to a tank but many smiles per miles
Sent from my CLT-L09 using Tapatalk
I used to get 26mpg in my FN2 but i didn’t mind it was made to get the neck wrung right out of it and that’s what i used it for.Totally agree.
It amuses me over the amount of discussion on fuel economy on golfgtiforum.co.uk, and it also seems to be a favourite discussion topic for many Polo GTI drivers over on uk-polos.net. I can understand it being the focus of attention if someone buys an fuel economy-focused car, but not with a performance car. One forum member on golfgtiforum.co.uk got quite annoyed when I suggested he’d bought the wrong car, and perhaps he’d have been better off with a Golf GTD rather than a GTI.
IMO, if you drive a performance car, life’s too short to worry about whether you’re getting 25mpg, 30mpg, 35mpg or some other mpg figure. When your car’s getting low on fuel, just fill it up, drive it and enjoy it! Just my opinion though, and there’ll no doubt be some with an opposing view.
Switching off stop start is also part of my normal engine starting routine.............
Aye a few cars surprised me when I was looking before getting the Leon. My brother in law has the Volvo c4 t4 and eats a lot of petrol sure it was below 30mpgI was looking at stats for a BMW X1 2.0 the other day.... for no reason other than curiosity. I was surprised to find that it’s combined MPG was a lot less on paper than the Cupra. And is a lot slower. So actually as mentioned above, the MPG on the Cupra isn’t actually half bad.
I bet other cars would be surprisingly bad on fuel too which you wouldn’t expect.