• Hi Guest we, are working on an upgrade to the forum this week, meaning the service may be unreliable at times and there will be some planned downtime at some point. Stay updated on this thread.
  • Guest, 🚨New Stock alert: Premium CUPRA valve caps now available in the store 👉 Order now from the merchandise store

REVO vs APR (differences in potential gains)

robdf2

Yellow is the best
Feb 21, 2006
3,605
3
location , location
Yep of course , but each time software is loaded onto a car it needs to adjust to the parameters , some cars adjust quicker than others , I know of one car that took about 2 weeks to fully adjust to the map.
 

LeonCR

Active Member
Oct 22, 2009
2,377
2
Yep of course , but each time software is loaded onto a car it needs to adjust to the parameters , some cars adjust quicker than others , I know of one car that took about 2 weeks to fully adjust to the map.


Now you see I was under the impression its only takes a few WOT pulls
 

Al

Active Member
Aug 29, 2005
7,199
9
only way to get a fair result would be to change the software on the same car

^^Probably^^. Snag there is you have to be at a tuners garage to have the bias out of it unless you have a tuner come to a r/r to swap a file.

To be honest though a car showing slightly better numbers on the dyno doesn't automatically mean it will have good performance numbers on the road. And how do you declare a winner? Highest peak numbers or the overall graph curves/area under the curves? Or a combination? There is more to performance than a rolling road plot. And tiny %'s of difference will be negligable anyway. And on the road, a **** driver won't take advantage of 2 extra bhp or 5 extra ft-lb's :rolleyes:
 

Adman77

Audre Est Facre
Feb 13, 2012
725
0
Hertfordshire
^^Probably^^. Snag there is you have to be at a tuners garage to have the bias out of it unless you have a tuner come to a r/r to swap a file.

To be honest though a car showing slightly better numbers on the dyno doesn't automatically mean it will have good performance numbers on the road. And how do you declare a winner? Highest peak numbers or the overall graph curves/area under the curves? Or a combination? There is more to performance than a rolling road plot. And tiny %'s of difference will be negligable anyway. And on the road, a **** driver won't take advantage of 2 extra bhp or 5 extra ft-lb's :rolleyes:

A **** driver wouldn't take advantage of an extra 20 of both! (Not claiming to be the next jenson button!)

The test would be just to satisfy the "who should I go for? There peak number is higher therefor better" type people.

End of the day, any poxy map from a reputable company will make your car faster