Na, but then I never really bothered how many mpg the car did. It always needed refuelled between 240 and 270 miles, just like the new one does. Once managed 400 miles from one tank on a run in the old one though - the new one barely managed that on its first run.
-
Evo Magazine are looking for a mint and (and ideally unmodified) Leon Cupra Sub8 to drive and photograph for a feature. Find out more here .
-
Hey Guest👍👎 We're looking for reviews of your local CUPRA or SEAT Dealership - it's quick and easy to do: Leave a review now
stage 1 revo
- Thread starter gazbcupra
- Start date
Thats why then. The carbonia intake is letting less air get to the engine and the air to fuel ratio gets adjusted accordingly. Ditch the carbonio and get a proper intake
Sorry, is it just me or does that not make sense ?
If the Carbonio was 'letting in less air to get to the engine and the fuel to air ratio gets adjusted accordingly', then surely this would richen the mixture and result in worse not better MPG ?
I think it's the other way round (comparing Carbonio to stock intake and filter here, remember).
Poverty
Guest
Sorry, is it just me or does that not make sense ?
If the Carbonio was 'letting in less air to get to the engine and the fuel to air ratio gets adjusted accordingly', then surely this would richen the mixture and result in worse not better MPG ?
I think it's the other way round (comparing Carbonio to stock intake and filter here, remember).
less air requires less fuel. It wouldnt need to automatically run rich
I was jesting though lol
Oh right!
He was at AMD as they were cheaper than next door for fitting the exhaust!
Sorry for hijacking the thread!
less air requires less fuel. It wouldnt need to automatically run rich
I was jesting though lol
Aaaarghh !!!
Now my head is starting to hurt !
Similar threads
