Thought id get out my shovel and dig up this old thread. The quoted 80 odd BHP from this engine was from AMD's rollers, which are renowned for over reading. Those are the same rollers that say a stage 1 1.8T
Ibiza FR has 226bhp, and the same rollers thought a stage 2 Cupra TSi was running 240
The saying is 'If you want an extra 20% more BHP then go on AMD's rollers'
Not trolling, just pointing out a strong positive correlation between AMD rollers and unusually highly BHP readings. I'm not doubting this car was a quick 1.2, and i bet it was probably a little quicker than standard.