Do LCR's rev to 7400?

Looks like major major heat soak, or they're monkies, or the calibration is all wrong... can you really do 140 odd in 5th?
 
People topped out at 135-140 ish mph in 5th (as far as their computer was showing)

I'm not sure at all what the issue is really. I think the first ST was well down o they seem to just add 50 bhp by pressing a button.

Ye that brought it up in line but is it acurate. Surely you cant just 'add' 50 bhp to a run and then say there you go mate sorted the problem.

Empi5 was down 30-35BHP down on a run at awesome 5/6 mnths ago.
My figures were only 10bhp down and jetset's was almost bang on.
 
You can adjust the numbers easily

adjust the DIN parameters, inlet temp, air pressure, coast down losses

all easy to do, and I know some tuners do do this....

If you have raw dyno data, you can plug it into the software & make it do whatever you want.
 
Looking at my graph again, it looks like mine my have slipped on the rollers or something, because they're is something seriously wrong with my torque curve.. It starts to rise steeply at 2400rpm, then at 3400rpm it goes sideways, then starts to rise again at about 4800rpm and peaks at........... Wait for it......... 6200rpm... LMFAO!!! :lol: .
Now i'm no expert at this.. But I know my peak torque isn't at 6200rpm.. my last RR at JBS was at about 3800rpm..
What's that all about..??? I'll try and get the graph up on here shortly..
 
Pics taken on phone, as scanner fooked.. lol.. So not the best quality, but you can get the idea..
MotorTec's graph.... Torque is the blue line..


JBS Auto Design's graph.. Torque is the Blue line again...

Slightly confused to say the least.. Can anyone shed any light on this???
 
Last edited:
I'll have a look later, but it might be worth seeing if teh graphs cross at 5252 rpm.....

I think they might have fudged them properly
 
Steve_B said:
Jetsetjimbo and bhp addicts bhp results look low as well, 216 & 202 don't look right, unless they're typo's

Mine's a 210 do I thought it seemed ok. I think the standard torque for a 210 is 199 lb/ft?

Will post up my graph when I get home.
 
CTIFF.jpg


Although my run seemed to be as it should (ish) there did seem to be quite a lot of variation from what people were expecting to see.