Why would you?
Its just my opinion I guess. Kind of like having a Clio197 and seeing a R27 draw up or in a Golf GTi and seeing R32 next to you. You are in a great car but for some reason the other one is that bit more special.
Fundamentally, the Cupra is top of the range, the FR isn't. I'm not belittling the FR in any way, its a fantastic car and I know theres not that much to choose between them but I thought I can afford it and SEAT must have their reasons for the Cupra to be the range topper so I didn't want to settle for anything else.
Looking at it objectively too, the TDi Cupra's are pretty thin on the ground and will hold their residual value better I would think

[/QUOTE]
Fine, but that does not mean everyone thinks the same way. I test drove a Cupra and an FR and decided that the FR was a better package. I could afford either, but could not justify the massive difference in Insurance groups. The suspension in the Cupra being too harsh. I also prefer the looks of the FR, especially the alloys. I think i preferred the power delivery of the 130 as well, but again, this is all my opinion also. Horses for Courses!
