Cunners wrote
So if the reading does come from the same sensor albeit a different part of the sensor how can it get such varying readings?
The CTS package, the green thing with an electrical plug at one end, contains two *
completely* *
separate* sensors. They are physically close to each other but not electrically connected at all, and act in different ways. If you look at the electrical plug you'll see four connectors, two for each of the sensors.
The gauge sender is a simple thermally sensitive resistor, working off the 12V instrument supply and feeding the gauge directly. It doesn't need to be precise, its main function is to warn you of gross changes in the coolant temperature.
The ECU sender is a more precisely specified device, working off the 5V ECU supply and giving the ECU precise detail of the engine's temperature, which it needs to work out fuelling.
My guess is that the dash gauge comes from an earlier age when a car might well not be fitted with an ECU, and it's cheaper for VAG to keep the old gauge and make a two-sensor CTS than it is to provide a digital-signal compatible gauge that can display the reading from the ECU system.
When u ve been on a run, so both the needle and climate control are reading around 90, turn off engine and leave for 15mins or so. Upon returning do not start engine but switch on. Your needle will still read near 90 but the climte control will be reading down around 30. Still without starting your engine turn your heaters on and slowly but surely the climate control figure will creep back up to 90.
That's an interesting experiment. I can only guess what's going on. As I said above, the Climatronic is getting a signal processed by the ECU and powered from a different electrical supply. I'm guessing that without the fans on, the Climatronic unit doesn't care what the coolant temperature is, but that is quite a stretch.
On the other hand, switching on the heater fans does nothing to change the condition of the coolant - nothing is moving the liquid around the pipes unless the engine is running to power the water pump. So your experiment proves that the ECU sensor reacts unreliably when the engine is not switched on - a condition in which it doesn't have to perform at all
This has to prove the readings are coming from different locations, i dont know for sure but that indicates that to me
There's nowhere else a coolant temperature reading *
can* come from.