Regular or Super Unleaded?

CalJames

Modification Addict
Jun 25, 2019
342
157
North Wales
A performance vehicle needs performance fuel.

I only run my cars on premium fuels, irrespective of the engine.
I did a test on Tesco standard unleaded and Momentum 99, 4 full tanks of each from empty. The period on the standard resulted in a slightly lower MPG and I'm not sure if it was placebo, but it felt a occasionally sluggish. Also take into consideration the additional additives in premium fuels.
This was with a Leon 1.4TSi
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loadmaster748

xyz

Full Member
Feb 28, 2004
559
203
oxford
Visit site
Always premium as per the fuel flap I think. I had to put ordinary 95 in my Golf R once as no 99 was available - the difference was almost immediate as my tank was nearly empty when I filled up. The lack of performance was very noticeable. I only put Shell V Power in mine.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loadmaster748

DigitalSushi

Active Member
Sep 7, 2020
147
69
Super/premium, hands down.

tried running both and noticed a significant falling in mpg with the normal stuff. Bloke at stealer said that as the engine is tuned for and expecting more bang from the fuel then it tries to compensate when it doesn't get it. Simply by lumping more fuel in. Now i don't know if he was talking nonsense but it did fit what i saw.

Tesco momentum is the best for me.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loadmaster748

Damo H

Remind me, what's an indicator?
Staff member
Moderator
Oct 3, 2012
4,707
2,816
Car Length In Front
The car will run on both.

BUT

RON is the bit you're interested in. Despite popular belief, the higher the RON doesn't mean a bigger bang, its about the stability of the fuel. So on a performance engine that can be pushed harder, the engine can work at higher bhp safer.

So the engine has been tuned with 98+ fuel in mind. So if you stick 95 in it, due to the nature of fuel grades differing across countries, and in the case or Republic of Ireland only having 95, the engine will still run safely, it will just adjust the fuelling to give less power/mpg. If memory serves, the guys in Ireland running 95 where only getting 260-265hp on a Cupra 280.

Other thing worth mentioning. my MINI loved Tesco Momentum 99, was never worth V Power. So when I got my 280 that's what I ran. I think it was @AndrewJB who posted ages ago about how his car although feeling fine on Momentum, the logs suggested otherwise.

So I decided to try V Power for a bit. I went from averaging 250-260 a tank, to 290-300. The better MPG was worth the extra premium (and longer journey to get it)

On the Carbon I've run V-Power from the start, sadly due to the extra weight I only average 260-270 a tank. But then it is Stage 1 etc.

This is a boring but interesting video around Ethanol in fuel, so as I have an Esso garage not tooooo far away, I may see how it runs on Esso's new premium fuel, as when away in France visiting my folks, Esso was what I used more often than not, and both cars ran really well on it despite the heat. But that maybe coincidence as it would defo be a different refinery.

 
Last edited:

Loadmaster748

Roll on summer.....
Aug 2, 2019
315
130
Surrey, UK
The car will run on both.

BUT

RON is the bit you're interested in. Despite popular belief, the higher the RON doesn't mean a bigger bang, its about the stability of the fuel. So on a performance engine that's can be pushed harder, the engine can work at higher bhp safer.

So the engine has been tuned with 98+ fuel in mind. So if you stick 95 in it, due to the nature of fuel grades differing across countries, and in the case or Republic of Ireland only having 95, the engine will still run safely, it will just adjust the fuelling to give less power/mpg. If memory serves, the guys in Ireland running 95 where only getting 260-265hp on a Cupra 280.

Other thing worth mentioning. my MINI loved Tesco Momentum 99, was never worth V Power. So when I got my 280 that's what I ran. I think it was @AndrewJB who posted ages ago about how his car although felt fine on Momentum, the logs suggested otherwise.

So I decided to try V Power for a bit. I went from averaging 250-260 a tank, to 290-300. The better MPG was worth the extra premium (and longer journey to get it)

On the Carbon I've run V-Power from the start, sadly due to the extra weight I only average 260-270 a tank. But then it is Stage 1 etc.

This is a boring but interesting video around Ethanol in fuel, so as I have an Esso garage not tooooo far away, I may see how it runs on Esso's new premium fuel, as when away in France visiting my folks, Esso was what I used more often than not, and both cars ran really well on it despite the heat. But that mayb coincidence as it would defo be a different refinery.

Cheers Damo, that's an interesting read. Thanks for taking the time to write it up!
 
  • Like
Reactions: DigitalSushi

black_sheep

Active Member
Mar 10, 2013
1,252
587
The car will run on both.

BUT

RON is the bit you're interested in. Despite popular belief, the higher the RON doesn't mean a bigger bang, its about the stability of the fuel. So on a performance engine that's can be pushed harder, the engine can work at higher bhp safer.

So the engine has been tuned with 98+ fuel in mind. So if you stick 95 in it, due to the nature of fuel grades differing across countries, and in the case or Republic of Ireland only having 95, the engine will still run safely, it will just adjust the fuelling to give less power/mpg. If memory serves, the guys in Ireland running 95 where only getting 260-265hp on a Cupra 280.

Other thing worth mentioning. my MINI loved Tesco Momentum 99, was never worth V Power. So when I got my 280 that's what I ran. I think it was @AndrewJB who posted ages ago about how his car although felt fine on Momentum, the logs suggested otherwise.

So I decided to try V Power for a bit. I went from averaging 250-260 a tank, to 290-300. The better MPG was worth the extra premium (and longer journey to get it)

On the Carbon I've run V-Power from the start, sadly due to the extra weight I only average 260-270 a tank. But then it is Stage 1 etc.

This is a boring but interesting video around Ethanol in fuel, so as I have an Esso garage not tooooo far away, I may see how it runs on Esso's new premium fuel, as when away in France visiting my folks, Esso was what I used more often than not, and both cars ran really well on it despite the heat. But that mayb coincidence as it would defo be a different refinery.

This ^

Lower RON fuels are less stable under combustion, and thus more likely to suffer pre-ignition (ie knock). In order to reduce knock (and thus damage to the engine components) the ECU retards the timing until the knock is at an acceptable level - but because the timing is not at its optimum position this equates to a drop in performance.

Currently where I live 99 RON Momentum is 8 pence per litre more than regular 95 RON unleaded at 113 pence per litre. The Esso 1 mile further down the road is 131 pence per litre.

The car runs very smoothly on the Esso fuel (2-3 tanks), but not too sure I can justify the price per litre difference, when there’s no issue with the Momentum.
 
Last edited:

Dannnnn

No longer active
Dec 9, 2018
440
200
Hampshire
I only run mine on super (Tesco Momentum)

Seeing as I did 1500miles last year, I couldn't care less about the price.
 

KXL

KXL
Dec 15, 2016
1,579
195
London, UK
Before I knew Tesco made Momentum 99, I once remember seeing at the tesco fuel station, a Lamborghini Aventador, a BMW M2, and an Audi RS3 all fuelling up at the same time, they might have been rolling together as were chatting whilst standing and fueling up their cars, was wondering, why would you have such expensive cars and fill up at a supermarket? Guess Momentum 99 was the reason.
 

70 Plate- Cupra 290

Active Member
Sep 10, 2020
99
32
Honest review on this, I had the same question for this past 6 months so I tried normal 95 for 5 months then 99 past month.
Firstly price wise it makes £6-8 difference at the most, So realistically if it made a difference which ill go through next its definitely worth the extra meal money..
Now In terms of difference, Whenever i had 95 fuel when in Sports/Cupra and putting the foot down, the way it put the power down wasn't as smooth, It struggled for a second to know what was going on then gave it the power it needed. Now with 99 i have definitely noticed the difference in how smooth the power is put down and also it feels like the full BHP is being used, Which after searching up online why it felt like this videos and forums have confirmed this is indeed the case when putting 99 compared to 95 so it does in the manual book too.

Conclusion: If you want smooth power output and want to use the whole power of the car for what its made for go for 99 RON, If you will be doing city driving 99 percent of the time and wont be kicking down or full throttling anytime soon go for 95 RON.

Also watch this technical video if you want to really know how it makes a difference:
 
Last edited:

RUM4MO

Active Member
Jun 4, 2008
8,078
1,106
South Scotland
I agree with the above, in normal situations, even with my wife's 2015 1.2TSI 110PS Polo, I aim to refuel with UL+ every 4th or 5th tank of fuel, to try to make use of the extra detergents, same for my 2011 Audi S4, though as its usage has been cut back so much (only used for out of town and longer journeys), and so only needed refilled twice a year, it always, at the moment, gets filled with UL+ and ideally Esso's new fuel.

My wife's previous car was a 2002 Polo 1.4 16V - so a low powered port injection engine, that engine was terrible, low power, no low end torque and poor economy when run on UL - always from BP or Esso, never from supermarkets, but when it was filled with Shell UL+ it behaved a lot better, improved drivability but slightly worse economy, so using UL+ fuels on engines that were never designed to be able to be optimised running with them, really can sometimes improve things despite what the "experts" claim - seeing(driving) is believing.
 

Damo H

Remind me, what's an indicator?
Staff member
Moderator
Oct 3, 2012
4,707
2,816
Car Length In Front
Honest review on this, I had the same question for this past 6 months so I tried normal 95 for 5 months then 99 past month.
Firstly price wise it makes £6-8 difference at the most, So realistically if it made a difference which ill go through next its definitely worth the extra meal money..
Now In terms of difference, Whenever i had 95 fuel when in Sports/Cupra and putting the foot down, the way it put the power down wasn't as smooth, It struggled for a second to know what was going on then gave it the power it needed. Now with 99 i have definitely noticed the difference in how smooth the power is put down and also it feels like the full BHP is being used, Which after searching up online why it felt like this videos and forums have confirmed this is indeed the case when putting 99 compared to 95 so it does in the manual book too.

Conclusion: If you want smooth power output and want to use the whole power of the car for what its made for go for 99 RON, If you will be doing city driving 99 percent of the time and wont be kicking down or full throttling anytime soon go for 95 RON.

Also watch this technical video if you want to really know how it makes a difference:
Sadly that video doesn't really explain what knock is, but then he does say to go find his video.
 

NotApplicable

Newbie....at my age?????
Mar 26, 2016
100
5
Somerset
but when it was filled with Shell UL+ it behaved a lot better, improved drivability but slightly worse economy, so using UL+ fuels on engines that were never designed to be able to be optimised running with them, really can sometimes improve things despite what the "experts" claim - seeing(driving) is believing.

When I first got my Cupra 280, I tried to work out whether one fuel over another would be better. So, I logged every tankful and the miles driven. After a while I clocked that there were a lot of variables that might make the test invalid, e.g. what time of year (warm up time?), how enthusiatically I drove, what pump I filled up at, whether I did a lot of long distance trips.

The only solution I came up with was to alternate fuels every tankful after running down to empty - and to do that for over a year. I managed to keep it up for 18 months (because my job gave me a fuel card that had to log everything). By which time, the difference in economy between standard unleaded (95 cheap Tesco) and super (98+ from Shell, BP or Tesco) was 3% improvement on super.

This still didn't remove the possibility that when the car drove better(on super), that I unconsciously drove harder because it was more fun.

Not worth the price difference if you are on a budget, to be honest, but the recommended fuel for a Cupra is 98+ - so I just use that now. The car ran on either with displaying any detrimental effects to the car itself. I still have it, it's Stage 2, over 67000 miles and nothing has gone wrong (apart from me breaking 4th gear) even though it had so much 95 through it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Loadmaster748

The Daily Meme

Insta: @thatredcupra
Jan 3, 2018
912
467
Cambridge
Page 264 of the manual:

Types of petrol
The correct grade of petrol is listed inside the fuel tank flap. The vehicle is equipped with a catalytic converter and must only be run on unleaded petrol. The petrol must comply with European Standard EN 228 or German standard DIN 51626-1 and must be unleaded. You can refuel with a maximum ethanol proportion of 10 % (E10). The types of petrol are differentiated by their octane rating (RON).

The following titles appear on the corresponding adhesive on the fuel tank flap:

Super unleaded 95 octane or normal 91 octane unleaded petrol
We recommend you use super 95 octane petrol. If this is not available: normal 91 octane petrol, with a slight decrease in power.

Super unleaded petrol with a minimum of 95 octanes
You should use super petrol with a minimum of 95 octanes. If super is not available, in an emergency you may refuel with normal 91 octane petrol. In this case only use moderate engine speeds and a light throttle. Refuel with super as soon as possible.

Super unleaded 98 octane or super 95 octane unleaded petrol
We recommend you use super plus 98 octane petrol. If this is not available: super 95 octane petrol, with a slight decrease in power. If super is not available, in an emergency you may refuel with normal 91 octane petrol. In this case only use moderate engine speeds and a light throttle. Refuel with super as soon as possible.


I have a cupra 290, it says Super unleaded 98 on the fuel cap cover, and so i've only ever put 98+ fuel in the car.
 

Fester999

Active Member
May 17, 2020
191
109
54
I decided to fill up my 1.4 17 plate fr with esso 98 fuel last night.
But upon arrival you have to pay up front which annoyed me so didn't bother.
Tbf my motorbike is definitely better on the premium stuff.
 

R4CK5

Active Member
Mar 8, 2017
609
85
I have a fuel card through work so unfortunately I can only put in the standard stuff which I've never had a problem with. I'd put premium in if I could (and yes I have raised the point that more cost up front = more mpg and therefore potentially equal or better off overall but they only see the bottom line at that particular time ) a cheeky tank if the premium stuff every now and then as it was the 'only pump free'

Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
 

Lmbarrett83

Active Member
Sep 8, 2017
1,538
619
Sheffield
It does advise on the inside of the fuel cap.In the previous cupra I used standard unleaded. In the current one is feed her Tesco 99.
 
SEATCUPRA.NET Forum merchandise