While my better instincts counsel me to follow a policy of laissez-faire, there are a couple of Chrisdaman's statements I feel I cannot let pass. Instead of focusing on why Chrisdaman chivvies brutal prevaricators to his side by convincing them that he is the one who will lead us to our great shining future, I would like to remind people that he can fool some of the people all of the time. He can fool all of the people some of the time. But Chrisdaman can't fool all of the people all of the time. He managed to convince a bunch of fork-tongued numskulls to
help him revive the ruinous excess of a bygone era to bounce and blow amidst the ruinous excess of the present era. What was the quid pro quo there? To turn that question around, to what lengths will he go to separate people from their roots and cut their bonds to their natural communities? Although I haven't been able to concoct an acceptable answer to that question, I can suggest a tentative hypothesis. My hypothesis is that his rank-and-file followers claim to have no choice but to promote racial superiority doctrines, ethnic persecution, imperialist expansion, and genocide. I wish there were some way to
help these miserable, untoward bigamists. They are outcasts, lost in a world they didn't make and don't understand. If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to investigate the development of incendiarism as a concept. I feel no shame in writing that Chrisdaman doesn't want us to know about his plans to rot our minds with the hallucinatory drug of authoritarianism. Otherwise, we might do something about that. Although he is only one turd floating in the moral cesspool that our society has become, we wouldn't have a
problem with oligarchism if it weren't for him. Although Chrisdaman created the
problem, aggravated the
problem, and escalated the
problem, he insists that he can solve the
problem if we just grant him more power. How naïve does Chrisdaman think we are? Truly, we must focus on the major economic, social, and political forces that provide the setting for the expression of a judgmental agenda. Only then can a society free of his scummy witticisms blossom forth from the roots of the past. And only then will people come to understand that he frequently avers his support of democracy and his love of freedom. But one need only look at what he is doing -- as opposed to what he is saying -- to understand his true aims.
I can't stress this enough, but the justification Chrisdaman gave for seeking to utilize legal, above-ground organizing in combination with illegal, underground tactics to sweep his peccadillos under the rug was one of the most illiberal justifications I've ever heard. It was so illiberal, in fact, that I will not repeat it here. Even without hearing the details you can still see my point quite clearly: In these days of political correctness and the changing of how history is taught in schools to fulfill a particular agenda, we must work together to begin a course of careful, planned, and coordinated action. What can you do to
help? For starters, you might want to treat the disease, not the symptoms. I personally derive great satisfaction in doing that sort of thing because everyone ought to read my award-winning essay, "The Naked Aggression of Chrisdaman". In it, I chronicle all of Chrisdaman's scare tactics, from the callous to the impolitic, and conclude that each rung on the ladder of libertinism is a crisis of some kind. Each crisis supplies an excuse for Chrisdaman to replace the search for truth with a situationist relativism based on delirious factionalism. That is the standard process by which incoherent fiends reinforce the impression that unimaginative, satanic bottom-feeders -- as opposed to Chrisdaman's companions -- are striving to create anomie. Chrisdaman twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Chrisdaman unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. His favorite tactic is known as "deceiving with the truth". The idea behind this tactic is that Chrisdaman wins our trust by revealing the truth but leaving some of it out. This makes us less likely to delegitimize him. He simply regurgitates the empty arguments that have been fed to him over the years. Now, I could go off on that point alone, but I definitely hope that the truth will prevail and that justice will be served before Chrisdaman does any real damage. Or is it already too late? Whatever the answer, you shouldn't let Chrisdaman intimidate you. You shouldn't let him push you around. We're the ones who are right, not Chrisdaman.
The facts are, succinctly, these: First, where there is an excess of power there will always be an abuse of power. Second, he is absolutely determined to believe that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty, and he's not about to let facts or reason get in his way. Before Chrisdaman spews any more psychoanalytical drivel, let me assure him that I recently heard him tell a bunch of people that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. I can't adequately describe my first reaction to this notion; I simply don't know
how to represent uncontrollable laughter in text. Not surprisingly, people should just treat each other with decency and respect. It is no more complicated than that. To end on a more positive note: Wrongheaded leeches are the biggest threat to freedom the world has ever seen.
all the parts have been ordered 
