Without having the discs and pads to hand its diificult to comment accurately as to their performance. Scoring in itself (depending on the depth) is not normally associated with a drop off in brake performance.
Whilst we are 100% happy to have any returned pads and discs sent onto Galfer's labs in Spain for a full analysis, the cost of any replacement discs is not something we are considering at this stage.
We have 2 non SEAT vehicles (but running the SEAT type pad with wear indicatiors disabled) running with 1055 and 1045 pads from the same batch and have covered over 12k each with no visable signs of disc degredation. We have other SEAT customers (including my wifes SEAT) where no disc degradation has occured and we are aware of some disc problems with OE spec pads in SEAT Leon Cupra R vehicles so the
problem is not obviously with the pads and doesnt seem to affect all cars.
This is why its prefferable to have pads and discs tested properly to understand where the issue is.
I have to say I am disspointed with comments made by some SEAT forum members and perhaps if they were more accurate in describing what they have been told in future, it might be more helpful.
Anyone returning pads for testing should include details such as, date purchased/fitted mileage the car has covered, mileage discs had done before replacing pads, mileage when disc damage became apparant. We also require details of the bedding in proceedure followed.
Lab analysis from Galfer will be able to determine accurately the life the pads and discs have had with regards to wear rates and heat levels attained etc.
I am sure you are all grown up enough to appreciate that while we will do what we can to assist and if there is a fault due to Galfer products supplied we will work with Galfer to resolve the situation, however if a fault lies elsewhere we will not be prepared to accept any liability.