Help needed please!

[PhilW]

yeah down to 97% to see if that makes any difference. Maybe your just working around a different problem tho.

 

[ChrisCurzon]

Heres the logs from 114

3rd gear

	Group A:	'114			
		Load	Load	Load	Load
	TIME				
MARKER	STAMP	%	%	%	%
	0	114.3	109	43.6	0
	0.4	116.5	111.9	74.4	100
	0.8	117.3	111.9	84.2	100
	1.2	119.5	114.9	89.5	100
	1.7	123.3	117.9	95.5	96.5
	2.1	129.3	123.9	100	100
	2.59	139.1	134.3	109	99.2
	3.1	154.1	147.8	121.1	100
	3.5	165.4	159.7	133.8	100
	3.9	169.2	162.7	148.1	100
	4.3	173.7	167.2	161.7	94.5
	4.7	177.4	171.6	175.9	90.2
	5.1	181.2	174.6	189.5	85.5
	5.49	182	176.1	191.7	83.1
	5.89	182.7	176.1	185	83.1
	6.29	183.5	177.6	180.5	82.7
	6.69	185	179.1	179.7	82.7
	7.09	186.5	180.6	182.7	82.4
	7.49	187.2	180.6	181.2	82.4
	7.89	188.7	182.1	182	82.4
	8.29	189.5	183.6	179.7	82
	8.69	190.2	183.6	180.5	82
	9.1	190.2	183.6	179.7	81.6
	9.5	190.2	183.6	178.9	81.6
	9.89	190.2	183.6	182.7	81.6
	10.29	190.2	183.6	178.9	81.2
	10.8	190.2	183.6	175.9	80.8
	11.2	190.2	183.6	175.2	80.4
	11.6	190.2	183.6	174.4	80.4
	12	190.2	183.6	175.2	80.4
	12.4	190.2	183.6	174.4	80
	12.8	190.2	182.1	172.9	80
	13.2	189.5	182.1	172.2	80
	13.6	190.2	182.1	54.9	0
	14	190.2	182.1	6	0

2nd gear

	Group A:	'114			
		Load	Load	Load	Load
	TIME				
MARKER	STAMP	%	%	%	%
	0	124.8	119.4	36.1	0
	0.51	127.8	122.4	39.1	0
	0.91	139.1	132.8	82	100
	1.31	158.6	152.2	97	100
	1.71	169.2	162.7	112	100
	2.11	175.9	168.7	129.3	100
	2.49	181.2	174.6	155.6	100
	2.89	185.7	177.6	184.2	83.1
	3.29	185	177.6	188	83.9
	3.69	188.7	180.6	191	85.1
	4.09	188.7	182.1	154.1	87.5
	4.49	189.5	180.6	191.7	86.7
	4.89	189.5	180.6	191.7	85.9
	5.29	190.2	180.6	183.5	84.3
	5.69	190.2	180.6	189.5	83.9
	6.09	190.2	180.6	182	83.5
	6.51	190.2	182.1	182	83.5
	7.01	190.2	182.1	186.5	83.5
	7.4	190.2	182.1	180.5	83.1
	7.8	190.2	182.1	179.7	83.1
	8.32	190.2	182.1	177.4	82.7
	8.7	189.5	180.6	175.2	82.4
	9.12	189.5	180.6	173.7	82.7
	9.5	186.5	177.6	170.7	94.5
	9.9	184.2	176.1	167.7	100
	10.3	185.7	177.6	45.1	0

Also tried lowering the % as you said Phil it got better in 3rd gear there was hardly any hesitation. But second was still as bad didn't want to lower too far as not sure what it would do?

Did a couple of quick logs with it lowered to 97%

3rd gear

	Group A:	'002			
		RPM	Load	Inj. On Time	Mass Flow
	TIME				
MARKER	STAMP	 /min	%	 ms	 g/s
	0	1800	104.5	11.89	37.44
	0.38	1840	109.8	13.12	42.03
	0.8	1920	119.5	14.35	48.22
	1.18	2040	129.3	16.4	54.06
	1.58	2120	140.6	18.04	60.14
	1.98	2240	153.4	20.91	70.06
	2.38	2360	163.2	23.78	79
	2.78	2520	175.9	26.24	88.89
	3.18	2640	186.5	27.47	101
	3.58	2760	180.5	26.65	90.97
	3.98	2880	178.2	26.24	100.36
	4.38	3000	181.2	26.65	105.44
	4.78	3120	181.2	26.65	105.31
	5.18	3240	178.9	26.24	109.83
	5.58	3320	181.2	26.65	115.25
	5.98	3440	179.7	26.24	116.08
	6.38	3520	179.7	26.24	119.33
	6.78	3640	178.2	26.24	122.89
	7.2	3760	177.4	26.24	130.17
	7.7	3840	179.7	26.65	130.97
	8.09	3920	180.5	26.65	131.5
	8.49	3960	163.9	23.37	96.81
	8.89	3720	21.1	1.23	0
	9.3	3160	4.5	1.23	0.64

2nd gear

	Group A:	'002			
		RPM	Load	Inj. On Time	Mass Flow
	TIME				
MARKER	STAMP	 /min	%	 ms	 g/s
	0	2160	59.4	6.56	24.75
	0.4	2280	91.7	11.48	47.83
	0.8	2400	118	13.53	62.86
	1.2	2640	151.9	19.68	86.97
	1.6	2880	181.2	25.83	109.06
	2	2920	191.7	22.96	103.17
	2.4	3040	191.7	22.96	112.47
	2.8	3240	191.7	22.96	127.69
	3.2	3160	182.7	22.14	143.61
	3.6	3200	182	21.73	109.5
	4	3320	191	22.55	120.81
	4.4	3480	191	23.37	127.53
	4.8	3480	188	23.37	126.03
	5.2	3560	185	25.01	120.5
	5.6	3720	180.5	26.65	126.5
	6	3880	184.2	27.47	137.69
	6.4	4120	183.5	27.47	144.53
	6.8	4280	178.9	26.65	147.44
	7.18	4520	178.9	26.65	152.17
	7.58	4720	175.2	26.24	159.42
	8	4920	173.7	25.83	159.42
	8.4	5080	169.9	25.42	165.61
	8.89	5240	166.9	25.01	168.17
	9.29	5360	163.9	23.78	169.53
	9.81	4640	8.3	1.23	0

Hope these can help in some way still stuck on what it is.

 

[PhilW]

Keep dropping it.

And log in 4th gear.

 

[ChrisCurzon]

will dropping it to far affect any thing though?

been doin second gear as does it the most there doesent really do it in 4th.

 

[DPJ]

114 Plot

You can see that it's making more than the ecu is asking for, at which point the wastegate duty cycle drops as it gets pulled back.

Overfuelling, but Phil's already said that.

 

[ChrisCurzon]

its just whats causing it to overfuel is the problem now.

i can turn down that fueling increase on full load as Phil said but is that just trying to get round a problem and would it do any damdge turning it down to much?

 

[ChrisCurzon]

well ill giev you bit of update dident work turning it down so have booked into prosport for 12th december and see if they can work out teh problem, said goignt o get revo guys to look over it to as could be map isuse as dave has said.

so hopefully will get it sorted then i hope.

 

[David_smith_909]

let us know how you get on bud

 

[ChrisCurzon]

taking this in on wednesday to see if can get sorted.

with what every one is saying its overfueling so what could cause this so can have an idea on wahts gone.

map,maf,lamda...? what else could cause this problem.

 

[ChrisCurzon]

any one know?

 

[ChrisCurzon]

Right update for you see if any one can help more not happy at all.

Took car to prosport and they said the maf was fault which I didn’t think I was anyway so changed that but then still had same problem so they have changed the revo settings down to timing 2 and boost 2 and there still hesitation and banging but now its just so slow and charged me £190 for the privilege.

Going to try taking it to awesome for them to see if they can find out what’s wrong I think a lambda sensor might have gone cause it to over fuel could that be the case?

What would anyone else suggest?

 

[__B3NNY__]

Id take it back mate and get them to sort it properly, having paid £190. HB2 T2 thats a joke. As standard they get set up around HB6 T6.

 

[ChrisCurzon]

i know tell me about it and they said took them an hour and 15 to change the settings to that so it ran better but its slow now!

taking it awesome gti next week as sure lambda sensor is faulty.

 

[David_smith_909]

id be well pissed if i was you mate
take it back to pro sport and leave it with them until its fixed

awesome-gti would fix it no probs, mucho respect to them, but if id have paid that much money to a company to "fix" my car and it came back worse, boy id be mad !!

and agreed that HB2 T2 is just something to laugh at

 

[ChrisCurzon]

damn rigth am annoyed at them they said i need to put more miles on it and then they need to rolling road tune it?!?

they wont look at it till after new year again though and dont think theyd fix it so am takign it to awesome as know they'll be better. only reason as dident take it to them at start was because though it could be map problem.

going to go back once awesome fix it and get them to turn it back up to HB9 T9 as it was before.

 

[footlong]

i'd consider seeking a bit of legal advice too- you have paid for a service you haven't received. run it in a bit? it is a car not a footballer with a dead leg. prosport sounds like utter bullshit to me. circulate and avoid imo