I made 215 and 243 lbt at badger today but on stage twobut was told considering the miles on the car it's no a bad figure as theres alot of engine ware ect
![]()
Did you manage to sort out your boost leak/s?
I made 215 and 243 lbt at badger today but on stage twobut was told considering the miles on the car it's no a bad figure as theres alot of engine ware ect
![]()
you need to ge yourself a boost leak tester m8.
Yup I dunno if I have just didn't really pull as hard in 3rd and 4th as it does in 2nd seconds great fun![]()
P.S. Mountune use our rolling road for their TUV and Ford manufacturer approval. If TUV gives our rolling road the thumbs up then I think we can be happy that we are using the right equipment?
Comparing rolling roads is pretty pointless because there are so many variables, such as how many fans to give airflow? I have just looked at a few fan set-ups at various companies and most wouldn't blow dry Wagners hair! Including a company mentioned above.
...............
What do others see on their requested boost from stage 2?
Code:Sunday 4 February 2007 16:53:53 06A 906 032 HN 1.8L R4/5VT 0002 '115 Group B: '031 Engine Speed Engine Load Spec. Boost Actual Boost Lambda Factor 700-6800 RPM 15-150% 990-1800 mbar <=1800 mbar /min % mbar mbar 2360 134.6 2280 1720 0.961 1 2560 172.2 2360 2220 1.008 1 2800 180.5 2460 2360 0.953 0.953 3040 182.7 2450 2310 0.922 0.906 3240 182.7 2370 2280 0.852 0.836 3440 189.5 2310 2330 0.828 0.836 3640 186.5 2310 2290 0.821 0.836 3840 185.7 2330 2320 0.828 0.836 4040 186.5 2350 2340 0.821 0.836 4320 185.7 2330 2340 0.821 0.836 4560 185 2310 2310 0.828 0.836 4760 183.5 2280 2280 0.828 0.836 4960 182.7 2270 2250 0.828 0.836 5200 184.2 2270 2250 0.828 0.836 5400 181.2 2290 2240 0.821 0.836 5560 180.5 2270 2230 0.813 0.836 5720 176.7 2210 2170 0.828 0.836 5880 173.7 2160 2130 0.821 0.836 6000 169.9 2130 2090 0.828 0.836 6120 166.9 2120 2090 0.836 0.836 6240 164.7 2120 2050 0.821 0.836 6360 162.4 2130 2040 0.821 0.836
A reasonably set up Leon k03S on Revo Stage 2, Bill - no FMIC
If you are insinuating me Shaun.. I hope you are not!
![]()
Hi Bill
No I'm not- you can put you're flaming faces out!
I just find it frustrating when our rolling road set-up is compared to a place that has one small fan at the front of the car. We can't get as much airflow as on the road with 3 big fans (1m diameterx3) so how 1 small fan can get enough air through the intercooler/engine/radiator I have no idea?
Cheers Shaun.
I agree with Mork, looks like loads of different graphs have been bundled together. I wouldn't worry too much about rolling road figures. Mine isn't making high figures on the RR but it is a weapon on the roads, surprises alot of other quick out of the box cars. Also I think D.Ks graph was funny when AmD rollered it for the first two runs and it made 262bhp and 270bhp. They supposigbly left it to cool down for 5 mins lol (which would have had major heatsoak) and re run it and it made
281![]()
Brad, I dont get why with one hand your slapping someone round the face and the other you are caressing them?Im not dissing your car mate as its lovely in every way, i just think the run of 281bhp wasnt true as you cant get rid of heatsoak just after a few mins of cooling down with a fan blowing at the intercooler, ive gave my car a bit of stick and you could still feel the engine had heatsoaked an hour later when driving it for the first 5 mins. I had even left my bonnet up for an hour in -2c conditions while i was working on it. I also heard through a couple of other sources that they have had to get their rolling road tested and a new license or something. Im not slating down AmD, as they have always been very helpful with me and always sorted me out even if the cost was alot of money, i'd go on other rollers to get a verification![]()
Hello bill I know we tested it lol but could a hissing sound on the way home after about half hour car defo runs loads better and feels soooo much smootheryou were a great help and will be getting all my done by you
![]()