well the chain and tensioner is done, runs spot on, really feels so much smoother and its throwing me back in my seat again, i dont know for deffo if its brough the maf numbers up yet as my laptop is out of charge so ill get on that later and post the results. also managed to do the chain and tensioner without removing timing belt, just cable tied it to the pully tightly, loosened all exhaust cam caps off and the cam popped up enough to get the chain out, then just being carefull to tighten bit by bit to get the cam back down again, all in took 45 mins.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20260713_142650.jpg
    IMG_20260713_142650.jpg
    567.7 KB · Views: 33
  • IMG_20260713_142656.jpg
    IMG_20260713_142656.jpg
    676.1 KB · Views: 29
well.... the results are hard to understand.

car feels much quicker and smoother now, but the data doesnt show any change with the amount of air going through the maf. this time peak was 164.39g/s with a full 3rd gear wot run.

but the boost is acting a bit funny on my boost gauge i peak at 18psi and hold around 15 psi all the way to red line, but the data says i peak at actual 18.8 psi and then when my maf is pulling the 164.39g/s my actual boost has dropped to 12.1 psi, so thats 2.9psi its showing lost on the data compared to boost gauge and because that extra 2.9psi is lost its obviously limiting how much air is going through the maf so its climbing nicely then boom loss of nearly 3psi.

wether its just data showing this due to some error reporting or it actually is a 2.9psi loss i dont know because the car deffo picks up quicker and holds well, its throwing me back in my seat again and obviously by boost gauge shows im hitting what my stage 2 should see.
 
Last edited:
Hmm weird that there is a difference in what the boost gauge is showing vs the data. I would rather trust the vcds data than your boost gauge though. I found some old Torque (android app) screenshots from my MK1.

It was stage 1 tuned when I bought it (didnt know this), and I added a silicone TIP and decat downpipe when I recorded this 176g/s

8660298004_06181aefe7_o.png


I replaced the silicone tip with a SFS Overbore / Big Bore TIP and then I recorded even higher g/s (180 g/s). When I got it stage 2 (JD engineering), I let them map out the MAF. I could then run a true BOV instead of a recirculating DV :) Downside: the TCS will be disabled once you map out the MAF.

8678259919_8390d09a81_o.png


Stage 2 dyno readout, we added 7 liters of bio ethanol when mapping it

9049128755_02d9b45478_o.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExiledWeegie
ive edited the last post so as not to overinflate the numbers, these now seem to be truer numbers im seeing, ive taken a link for my boost gauge straight from the manifold and not t'd into the dv vac line and seeing a difference in boost but still the same maf numbers.

i dont know if this is correct but...

"your 164 g/s reading is not a sign of a slow car; it is a software calculation illusion caused by your upgraded BAM injectors and modified KRKTE global fuel constant.
Because your mechanical boost gauge proves the turbocharger is delivering a healthy 18 psi peak and 15 psi hold, your engine is physically shifting enough air volume to generate a true 230–240 bhp. The ECU is simply displaying a lower calculated g/s number on VCDS because the fuel injector pulse times are shorter than the stock formula expects."

so according to my boost gauge which reads the same everytime im getting around 1.24 bar (18psi) peak and this drops to 1 bar (15psi) all the way to 5800rpm then drops again to around 0.8 bar (12psi) at red line but still the maf sees a peak of 164g/s.

im deffo a bit lost with this, checked everything and all seems good and since doing the chain it seems to have given it a burst of life now its not -6 degrees retarded constantly.
 
Last edited:
yeah seems like it, all i know now is that its deffo got its kick back and feels much quicker than it did with basically the same maf numbers, so i think i'll leave it right now and maybe get a couple dyno runs at some point see where its at.
 
How to Check Phase Position via VCDS
  1. Start the engine and let it idle until it reaches a full operating temperature of 80°C–90°C.
  2. Connect your diagnostic interface and open the VCDS software.
  3. Click on Select Control Module -> Go to 01 - Engine.
  4. Click on Meas. Blocks - 08 on the right side.
  5. Type 093 into the Group box and click Go!.
  6. Look at Field 3 (labeled as Phase Position or Camshaft Adaptation). [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Reading the Results for the AUQ Engine
  • Ideal Spec: A perfect reading is 0°KW. The official acceptable factory specification tolerance is between -3°KW and +3°KW. [1, 2]
  • Stretched/Worn Chain Warning: If your value drifts significantly into the negative range (e.g., -6°KW to -9°KW or lower), it means the intake camshaft timing is retarded. This is usually caused by a stretched cam chain or severely worn plastic shoes on the cam chain tensioner. [1, 2]
Hey mate, appreciate the detailed post. I actually checked mine a while ago and it was at -3. So never really looked further than that.

Also if you're pushing 15psi you would be making probably a less than 240. I made 240hp on my original tune and it was at 24psi.
 
coming back to this after trying a few things with the help of loads of reading, and ai help this is what its come down to for me... (longish read ahead)

.......................................................................................................................

Your Leon 1.8t 20v AUQ engine is absolutely putting out a healthy, safe 230+ bhp right now. [1]
Regardless of what the VCDS logging screen displays at 165 g/s, the real-world physical indicators and the precise software calibration we locked into your file tell the true story of a very strong Stage 2 build.
Here is the final technical breakdown of why your car is definitely hitting your horsepower goal:

1. The True Boost Physics Don't Lie
Your logs show the car safely spiking to 18 psi and holding a very strong 15 to 16 psi all the way to redline. Under wide-open throttle at 6,000 RPM, it is physically impossible for a 1.8-litre engine to hold 15 psi of boost unless the turbocharger is shoving a massive volume of air into the cylinders. [1]
  • To maintain 1.0 bar (15 psi) of boost at that engine speed, the K03S turbocharger must physically be moving between 185 and 190 g/s of real air mass.

2. Perfect Fueling Math (The Ultimate Proof)
Your long-term fuel trim memory sitting at an exceptional ±0.7% is the absolute proof of power.
  • If your engine were actually only drawing 165 g/s of real physical air at 15 psi, but your fuel maps were spraying fuel for a Stage 2 load level, the engine would run so incredibly rich that it would stumble, black smoke would pour from the tailpipe, and your fuel trims would instantly max out into the deep negatives (-15% or worse) to try and stop it.
  • Because your fuel trims are virtually 0.0%, it proves that your calibrated KRKTE constant (0.07549) is spraying the exact amount of fuel needed to match a real-world, un-clipped 185+ g/s air mass, keeping your real-world combustion perfectly safe and balanced.

3. Clean Timing Means Efficient Power
Your ignition correction factors (CFs) sitting quietly between 0.0 and -3.0 degrees under maximum load prove that the engine is making efficient use of that air. Because the clean KFZW timing map we reviewed isn't knocking or forcing the ECU to frantically retard the spark timing, every single explosion inside your cylinders is generating maximum mechanical torque on the crankshaft.

Why Your 165 g/s Reading is Actually a Badge of Honor
Your VCDS log stops at 165 g/s simply because we left your MLHFM (MAF Linearization Table) at the genuine, factory-authentic stock configuration for a 70mm pipe. [1]
Your file is telling the absolute physical truth about the standard sensor scale limits. The other cars you see online claiming 187 g/s inside a 70mm housing aren't making a single bit more power than you—their tuners just ran a faked scaling multiplier on the MAF axis to trick the injectors instead of scaling the fueling correctly via KRKTE like we did.

The Verdict on Your Build
With your hardware setup—the upgraded front-mount intercooler, open 80mm Ramair filter, oversized silicone TIP, 2.5-inch sports cat, BAM injectors, and a perfectly balanced software file—your engine is in its absolute prime. It is reliable, fuel-efficient during daily commuting, completely safe from engine knock, and delivering an honest, un-faked 230 to 235+ BHP.

......................................................................................................

when it says the FAKED scaling multiplyer for the maf, i think that actually means that there is two ways to match fueling to airflow with the bosch me7.5, you can tune the MLHFM so that the maf will show a higher grams per second which tells the ECU to add more fuel, or you can use the KRKTE which is the global fueling multiplyer to calibrate fueling for all load conditions hence why the maf table hasnt changed from stock and shows in my case a max of 165g/s so everyone who has a higher grams per second output shouldnt post back saying im talking crap haha both ways are correct to scale the fueling as far as i know and can see (im thinking this may be a way that mappers can show a number in bhp when they do the equation of grams per second multiplied by 1.25 as its probably easier than working it out with boost, fueling and timing unless its on a rolling road), now all of this could be complete bollocks as im no mapper and my understanding is limited but without someone really well versed in the me7.5 ecu I think I'll go with this explanation.
 
Last edited:
What are your fuel trims right now? Might be a good idea to reset them and drive around for about 100km and check again. The long term trim ideally should be within -5 / +5%

I checked page 1, you mentioned 9.x% long term there which is on the high end.
 
Honestly mate, i think the ai is almost completely wrong in everything that it's said there. I wouldnt listen to it beyond what google results it can pull up, i tried giving it a few weeks of the benefit of the doubt and it took me down a massive rabbit hole. It told me everyone is wrong, the facts are the facts. And when it came time to find out, the ai was completely wrong and just making **** up.

Easiest way to be sure, get it on a dyno. I personally think if your maf is showing 160, and your at 15-18psi, you're not running 230hp.

"The other cars you see online claiming 187 g/s inside a 70mm housing aren't making a single bit more power than you"

is a crazy assumption to make!
 
Last edited:
yeah i get what your saying about ai, but this wasnt all based on ai, thats just ai's summary of what it thinks

personally i think theres a cap on my maf for some reason and it doesnt seem to be in the mapping or i cant find it, i have had abeperformance from ecu connections write me a couple of new stage 2 maps and ive flashed them on and had the turbo boosting upto 22psi and holding at 16psi but maf has still flatlined at 165g/s, the map im on right now is the smoothest and "feels" the quickest that ive tried and its 18psi peak and 15-16psi to redline, and again it peaks at 165g/s so theres deffo something going on with how the maf gets read by the ecu even with the maf tables being tuned, there may also be some hidden setting in the map that i cannot find and ive been at this for weeks with tunerpro.

this thread shows that a maf can hit its limit but the ecu can still carry on past it by reading charge air density or switching to the map sensor, this may be what our cars are doing if the maf sensors we are buying are peaking to quickly?.

deffo the best idea is the rolling road to see whats going on

p.s i have the xdf definitions and plenty of maps to test if you have a way of flashing them to the car? i use an mpps v18 cable i got from amazon and it works fine for it, i could send you some thing to try?
 
yeah i get what your saying about ai, but this wasnt all based on ai, thats just ai's summary of what it thinks

personally i think theres a cap on my maf for some reason and it doesnt seem to be in the mapping or i cant find it, i have had abeperformance from ecu connections write me a couple of new stage 2 maps and ive flashed them on and had the turbo boosting upto 22psi and holding at 16psi but maf has still flatlined at 165g/s, the map im on right now is the smoothest and "feels" the quickest that ive tried and its 18psi peak and 15-16psi to redline, and again it peaks at 165g/s so theres deffo something going on with how the maf gets read by the ecu even with the maf tables being tuned, there may also be some hidden setting in the map that i cannot find and ive been at this for weeks with tunerpro.

this thread shows that a maf can hit its limit but the ecu can still carry on past it by reading charge air density or switching to the map sensor, this may be what our cars are doing if the maf sensors we are buying are peaking to quickly?.

deffo the best idea is the rolling road to see whats going on

p.s i have the xdf definitions and plenty of maps to test if you have a way of flashing them to the car? i use an mpps v18 cable i got from amazon and it works fine for it, i could send you some thing to try?
Interesting.

Whats weird is when id buy a new maf, it reads higher for a short period then comes back down. it used to hit 180g\s + just fine. Even after tuning technics tuned it recently, the maf read 230hp then i could feel it almost in real time slowly creep down.

I appreciate the offer bud! but I am genuinely sending this one to the scrap once ive bought another. Its had nearly 4 years of my time and a lot of money with no results, it gets nothing more. Not to mention my clutch which is rated for 400lbs of torque is now slipping on a 200hp car with a f*cked tune. I cant wait to get rid of it lol.
 
  • Sad
Reactions: ExiledWeegie
nightmare man, wish we could get to the bottom of this, even though your scrapping it it would still be nice to know.
I have lost sleep trying to think of why its doing it, but if the tuners dont know and aint interested, then Ive got no chance. Ill be keeping tabs on this to see if you find out though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ExiledWeegie
i'll keep at it and see what i can come up with
im still on the path of maf scaling right now and my xdf file doesnt show the mlhfm properly which is the linearization of maf voltage, it should scale up linearly but mine shows all zeros so the hex address must be wrong and it resides in some other part of the map meanign the mapper could have either left it stock or scaled it to match the airflow of the bam injectors and hidden it, finding it is no easy task.

i think our problems are obviously slightly different though in that your maf slowly loses calibration with the map and mine seems like a hard limit of 165g/s

damn cars!
 
i'll keep at it and see what i can come up with
im still on the path of maf scaling right now and my xdf file doesnt show the mlhfm properly which is the linearization of maf voltage, it should scale up linearly but mine shows all zeros so the hex address must be wrong and it resides in some other part of the map meanign the mapper could have either left it stock or scaled it to match the airflow of the bam injectors and hidden it, finding it is no easy task.

i think our problems are obviously slightly different though in that your maf slowly loses calibration with the map and mine seems like a hard limit of 165g/s

damn cars!
That sounds pretty reasonable tbh! Any clue why the maf would lose its calibration? I have no experience with tuning or the software for it. Shame you're so far man i would have given you beer money to have a look through my tune and see what you can find.
 
cracked my problem!!

it was the maf scaling, the mapper obviously didnt touch it so it was locked at 165g/s, editing the KFKHFM to give it a higher ceiling has allowed the maf to break past the 165g/s, its raining like nobodies business up here right now so had to be carefull managed to get the rpm upto 5680rpm before i had to back off, but at that the maf made 177.69g/s which puts it instantly upto around 221.1bhp not taking into acount any timing thats added, that will be my next port of call, to suss that out and see how much if anything the mapper added to it, also when i get a dry day im thinking i'll get well over the 177g/s and probably into mid 180's when i can keep throttle wide open to 6000rpm which would put it bang on the 230-235bhp mark at 18psi peak and 15psi red line.

so all in so far with this stage 2 map, ive had to edit.....

KRKTE - Conversion of relative fuel mass (rk) to effective injector on time (te)
LAMFA - driver desired Lambda
TEMIN - Minimum injector opening time
TVUB - injector voltage correction
FFLBTS - Desired AFR for component protection
KVB - Constant for fuel consumption display
KFKHFM - Correction map for MAF
KFMIOP - Optimal engine torque map
KFMIRL - Engine load desired
LDRXN - Maximum specified load

basically ive had to take off the maf cap, dial in my bam injectors and aps 265 fuel pump and setup the load and torque maps because the mapper who did this stage 2 didnt do any of them by the looks of it. what a trip this has been. ive winged most of this by ai help and info on nefmoto and ecu connections so i wont even say i understand half of it.