To join rather late to this discussion...
I started off in March/April 2020 scared sh..less seeing the daily death toll the government/media where pushing. Then sadly a work colleague lost his dad to Covid who as far as known had no underlying health conditions and was only 60 something.
The
problem is - the more I read the less I trust Boris is 'following the science'!
I share some really interesting links below to actual science and data.
Really interesting lady who de-mystifies the junk statistics spouted by the mainstream media:
vaccine efficacy paper
review:
www.zoeharcombe.com
Sage conflicts of interest - the people recommending we all have vaccine have a vested interest in said vaccine (which they don't disclose!) more vaccine's more money in their pockets!
www.zoeharcombe.com
This is from John Dee's FB Almanac group -
"The analytical journal of a retired statistician, consultant analyst and former head of clinical audit at a busy NHS teaching hospital. As a clinical data analyst I specialised in assessment of clinical outcomes across a range of disciplines and served on a regional clinical reference committee in addition to supporting the directors of my NHS Foundation and Primary Care Trusts. I've also provided analytical support for secondary and tertiary service providers across NHS England. I use data from official sources to reveal what the authorities should be telling us about the COVID-19 pandemic but are not."
Log in to Facebook to start sharing and connecting with your friends, family and people you know.
www.facebook.com
I saw a post previously about the PCR - and someone questioning it's accuracy.
Even the PCR 'inventor' who got a noble price for it - Kary Mullis is on record for saying all it can do is make a whole lot of something out of not much of something. Meaning it can't tell you if you actually have the condition Covid-19 caused by the virus Sars-cov-2. All it can do is amplify trace particles. It would
help if when they preform PCR tests they also tell you the CT (cycle threshold) that they used - if low then you can 'presume' a high viral load so by inference you could have Covid 19 the condition; if low it's basically a meaningless test - BUT they don't publish CT's
One thing is for sure - they way this government have handled this pandemic is shocking.
While there's a lot there that you and I would disagree on, I think most people would agree that what's missing overall for everything at the moment is a bit of nuance.
It's kind of like Brexit. I've got no
problem telling people I voted to remain, but that doesn't mean that I think the EU is perfect in every way, the same as I imagine there are people who voted leave who think the government has done a shocking job of actually making it happen. There are rabid idiots at the extreme ends who are best off ignored.
I can have confidence in the Covid vaccine, even if I don't trust 'big pharma' and I don't actually know or understand how the vaccine works.
I can think the government has done a terrible job and think they have no real interest in our health and wellbeing without believing stories that the government is actively trying to kill us.
There's something called '
Hanlon's Razor', which says "
never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity". Most of what the government has done has made things worse, but that doesn't mean they're out to kill us - just that they're woefully inept.
At the same time, it doesn't mean the things they've done are wrong or harmful - lockdowns, for example,
do work, but they have to be done at the right time and with the right conditions. Too many people still think masks are there to protect the wearer, when they're to
reduce onward transmission. You can still catch Covid if you're in contact with someone who has it and is wearing a mask. Vaccines won't stop you from
catching Covid, or experiencing symptoms, but they do reduce the severity of symptoms and make it less likely that you'll go to hospital or die of it. People dying of Covid after having the vaccine does not mean the vaccine doesn't work, and nobody has ever said that the vaccine would make anyone immune.
These problems come about when people try to simplify complex issues. The government has to try and make the message simple, and that can trip them up, but at the same time, there are people who will
tell you things are simple because it's a great way to manipulate you.
The question I ask of a lot of the time is what someone's motive is - why is this person saying in a year my 5G chip will be activated, giving me cancer? Why is that doctor telling me that Covid doesn't even exist? Fame, notoriety, a trail of people hanging on your every word, money... Some people just want to inform and educate people so they can survive and live a healthier life. Some people just like to stir **** up. It can be hard to tell the difference - especially if that person is telling you things that you want to hear...
was quoting statistics to me which convinced him not to get the jab because he thinks it’s dangerous - “only” 1.1% of people who get it actually die from it. I didn’t hear anything more after I told him that 0.0019% of people die after having the vaccine - and that, as the stats say, is dying after the vaccine - not as a direct consequence of having the vaccine.
