any ideas why James's software could'nt cope with my g'box on coast down? Can't think why myself.. Only diff being he declutched on mine vs engaged neutral on others.. hence only being able to do atw figures..Wilko said:bill dan and mike were all there.
As I've tried to explain on many ocassions, trans losses are measured inertia losses.
The rr has a known inertia, and it calculates how fast the inertia is accelerated, and thus calculates power. The inertia of the drive train is calculated on the run down, and added to the rr inertia to give a fly wheel figure.
If the RR has high inertia then the inertia of the drivetrain is less significant, and therefore lower 'measured' transmission(inertial) losses.
If your drivetrain actualy lost 40hp (30kW) it would mostly be converted to heat. Your boiler in your house is <30kW at full pelt. Put the heater from your boiler under your gearbox, and see how long it takes before your gearbox melts.
Drive train losses are 5% at most. If they were more then there'd be a lot of engineers on the dole.
Ultimately JBS rr shows standard power on standard cars, so it can't be far off.
Shame as I wanted to see what the dog box losses were..
oh well.